onlineFOCUS – News and Stuff For Rochford District since 2003

 

Archive for Planning Applications

Sports Pitch Application Recommended For Approval

Football

 

The Sports Pitch application from Academy Soccer comes to the District Council Development Committee next Thursday. You can find the agenda here.

The report runs to 32 pages but here are the officer’s conclusions:

6 CONCLUSION
6.1 The proposed use of the site for football pitches is an appropriate use of land
within the Metropolitan Green Belt. The proposed changing rooms would be
appropriate facilities for outdoor sport and recreation in accordance with the
National Planning Policy Framework and local policies for development in the
Metropolitan Green Belt. The ball catch fencing will have an impact on the
openness of the area generally but has to be weighed against the wider
recreational benefits, access to the countryside inherent in the application and
its necessity on highway safety grounds.
6.2 The use proposed would provide sufficient off street car parking and would
not give rise to adverse conditions of highway safety or residential amenity
that would weigh against the merits of the proposal.

 

Officers Recommend : Don’t Allow This Church To Be Demolished

united reform church

There’s a planning application on the latest “Weekly List” to demolish the United Reform Church to be demolished and be replaced by a two-storey garage/ games room for an adjacent dwelling.

The key question here is not whether the building should be kept as a church, because planning permission has already been given to convert it to one residential unit. The key question is whether the building should remain, as part of the Great Wakering Conservation Area.

Officers are recommending refusal of the application because of its ‘positive contribution’ to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area.

You can find the officers report here.

Makro Apply For Longer Delivery Hours

Makro have put in a planning to allow expended hours for deliveries, allowing the parking of delivery vehicles, and operating approved plant machinery outside the building.

The current permitted hours are :
0730 – 2100 hrs Monday to Friday
0730 – 1900 hrs on Saturday
0900 – 1730 hrs on Sunday

Makro want to alter that to:
0500 – 2200 hrs Monday to Saturday
0700 – 1900 hrs on Sunday

The application number is 14/00365/FUL and you can find it here.

If you have comments , make sure you submit to the council (you can do it via the link). But any thoughts here would also be welcome.

Sports Pitches Application

The application for the sports pitches at Old London Road Rawreth will come to the Development Committee on July 24th.

Trenders Avenue Application Withdrawn

The planning application in Trenders Avenue, Rawreth to “Demolish Existing Commercial Woodworking Workshop and Construct Single Storey Pitched Roofed Building for Use as Commercial Use Class B1″ has now been withdrawn.

Ron Oatham and Chris Black had asked for a site visit, but obviously, now the application has been withdrawn this won’t take place.

116 Homes, A Takeaway, And Lots Of Windows

bellhouse

It was a long meeting for the District Council Development Committee on Thursday evening. There were only 3 items, but a lot of debate! This was the outcome:

Star Lane Brickworks, Great Wakering – 103 houses and 13 flats. This is the kind of application that councillors like in principle – converting a derelict brownfield site into homes. The density was reasonable, and every house met our minimum garden standards. But most councillors were unhappy. Some Councillors , such as Ron Oatham, criticised the architecture, others, such as Jo McPherson , were concerned that there was only 10% affordable housing when our policy is for 35%. The response from officers was that independent assessments had shown that the scheme was only financially viable with a low percentage of affordable housing.

The chair of the meeting, Phil Capon, read the mood of the meeting well, and showing good chairmanship, moved that the application be deferred to allow further discussions, and this was agreed. It shows how difficult it can be to deal properly with large planning applications in one meeting.

215 London Road, Rayleigh – conversion of a shop into a takeaway This item had been called in by Toby Mountain. Joan Mockford moved refusal for aa number of reasons including noise,and nuisance, and it was refused.

Bell House, High Street, Great Wakering – New Windows This is a sheltered housing complex in Great Wakering, just outside the Conservation Area (see the picture above). Sanctuary Housing Association had applied to replace the old rotting wooden windows with pvc ones. Officers had recommended refusal because of the unsuitable appearance next to the Conservation Area. However councillors thought that brown pvc would actually be suitable, and approved the application. The elderly ladies in the public gallery, who had sat there cheerfully all night, went home happy – they are going to get warmer hosues and no drafts…..

Sports Pitches Planning Applications Resubmitted.

The two planning applications from Academy soccer have been resubmitted:

Application :14/00331/ADV
Parish: Rawreth Parish Council
Ward: Downhall And Rawreth
Proposal:
One Non -Illuminated Goal Post Type Sign to Site Entrance
Location:
Land North Of A129 East Of A130 Old London Road Rawreth

Applicant:
Academy Soccer
2 Kingswood Crescent
Rayleigh
Essex
SS6 7BH

_____________________________________________________
14/00332/FUL
Parish: Rawreth Parish Council
Ward: Downhall And Rawreth
Responsibility:

Proposal: Change of Use of Land From Agricultural to Use for 8 No. Football
Pitches. Provide Area for Car Parking, Provide Four Storage
Containers, Provide Four Storage Containers for Use as Changing
Rooms and Toilets and Construct 6.5m High Ball Catch Fencing to
Boundary of Site With A129 and A130
Location: Land North Of A129 East Of A130 Old London Road Rawreth

Applicant:
Academy Soccer
2 Kingswood Crescent
Rayleigh
Essex
SS6 7BH

You can see the them online and make representations on the district council website

Planning Application in Trenders Avenue, Rawreth

There is a new planning application in Trenders Avenue, Rawreth:

14/00131/FUL
Address Of Proposal: The Barn, Trenders Avenue, Rayleigh, Essex, SS6 9RG
Proposal: Demolish Existing Commercial Woodworking Workshop and Construct Single Storey Pitched Roofed Building for Use as Commercial Use Class B1 (Business)

To see the application, click here.

Two Controversial Planning Applications….

There are two controversial Rayleigh planning applications on this week’s “yellow list”.  Officers are recommending that one is refused and the other one approved, and this will come into effect for each one unless any Councillor calls it in by  1  pm on  Wednesday.

The one recommended for REFUSAL  is for an extra house in the garden of 89 Down Hall Road (the house with the lake).

Officers are recommending refusal – basically on the grounds that the house is out of keeping with the spacious and uniform street scene of Lakeside, it gives a contrived and awkward relationship with the houses around it, and this sis symptomatic of over-devlopment.

 

The one recommended for APPROVAL is for a take-away in the empty newsagents shop in London Road. 46 residents have objected. However officers are recommending approval , however with a closing time of 10:30 pm instead of 1:00 am which is what the applicants asked for.

 

No links to these yet on the council website…

 

 

A Huge Fishing Lake, A Bungalow Next To An Electricity Sub-Station, Demolishing The London Road Filling Station, And Much More

We don’t normally write about so many planning applications.  But in the latest ‘weekly list’ of planning applications, there’s a wide range of items … including a fishing lake in Hockley, a bungalow on the Corner of Preston Gardens and Hambro Avenue in Rayleigh, and the demolition of the filling station in London Road Rayleigh.

You can download the list here. (193kb)

Unless any councillor calls it in, the officers recommendation comes into effect at 1 pm Wednesday.

Anyway, here are the items. For full information , download them via the link.

app1

This is a 0.6 hectare lake for fishing, recommended for approval.

app2This is recommended for refusal, the reason being:

“The proposal would result in a cramped form of backland/infill development which would appear out of character in the street and amount to overdevelopment of the site. “

 

The report then lists the factors that indicate it is overdevelopment:

“The lack of a satisfactory parking arrangement which would allow all vehicles to satisfactorily manoeuvre within the site, the awkward rear garden arrangement and relationship between the proposed and existing property which would give rise to issues of privacy and the north facing garden which would be subject to overshadowing by the existing large tree, suggests that the proposal cannot be comfortably accommodated within the site and that the proposal amounts to overdevelopment.”

app3This is recommended for approval.

app4

This is recommended for refusal, because if this land was no longer highways land it could prevent any future junction improvements:

“The proposed change of use will result in the loss of highway land and would be contrary to Policies T1 and T2 of Rochford District Councils Core Strategy to the detriment of future capacity improvements at this junction with Rawreth Lane and Chelmsford Road.”

app5

This is another one recommended for refusal, for two reasons – over-development and undersized garden:

 

1 The proposal would fail to provide an adequate side isolation space between the resultant external side wall of the building and the site boundary. The proposal would immediately abut the highway resulting in the loss of space about the building and at two storey would significantly reduce the spaciousness about the junction. The lack of space would prove detrimental to the street scene resulting in a cramped appearance, harmful to visual amenity and uncharacteristic of the locality and representing overdevelopment ….

2. The proposal would fail to provide sufficient private amenity space for the existing dwelling and the proposed dwelling and would not be in accordance with the Local Planning Authority’s adopted standards, of which each garden should have a minimum of 50 square metres…

app6

A previous application was refused, this one is recommended for approval because of the changes that have been made.

app7This is recommended for approval.

Two Decisions

There are quite a lot of items at tonight’s meeting of the District Council Development Committee. However 2 of the items were:

35 London Hill, Rayleigh- build 3 houses in the garden. This is a very unusual , large , sloping garden bordering on Rayleigh Mount and the Windmill, largely hidden from the road. Ward councillor John Griffin moved refusal with a lot of help from other councillors, and it was indeed refused, on the grounds of (roughly) , effect on the Rayleigh Conservation area, lack of information on drainage, and being detrimental to the residential amenity of neighbouring properties.

The Lawn, Hall Road, Rochford. Install 6 rows of solar panels. This was recommended for refusal by officers on the grounds of being in the Special Landscape Area, and effect on the listed building. However ward councillor Keith Gordon successfully moved approval.

Lambricks Planning Application

New planning application:

14/00159/FUL
Parish: Rayleigh Town Council
Ward: Trinity
Proposal: Proposed Redevelopment of the Site With 10 New Dwellings
Comprising 8 n0. Detached Houses and 2 no. Semi-detached
Houses and One Carport. New Vehicular Access into the Site.
Location: 41 – 67 Lower Lambricks Rayleigh Essex

Applicant:
Matthew Homes Limited

Choose the layout you want to see

July 2014
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Who We Are

We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click here to email us .

viewfrommount

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.



Daily Reporting by Chris Black

With support from:
Ron Oatham Ron Oatham Bruce Smart Bruce Smart Chris Stanley Chris Stanley

Latest Comments

  • Jim Cripps: Richard @7 – getting the volume away via the watercourses is of course fundamental, and cleared...
  • Jim Cripps: West Rayleigh / Rawreth people unite and help the cause by sending a simple e-mail to the Planning...
  • 123: I understand that the 3 councillors required to call this in has now happened. Is there any hard evidence of...
  • Jim Cripps: I reiterate my request for any specific information on issues at the Eon site on Sunday - this is...
  • admin: Jim. , deadline is midnight Friday, will probably send a call-in request tonight.
  • richard lambourne: Chris, that is blindingly obvious the problem with watercourse is that you have to make sure there...
  • bruce smart: As posted previously, we would all have more sympathy for any agency that cleared drainage ditches and...
  • BC: Yes maybe Church Road could take one of those slots!! Like many others is was only neighbours pulling together...
  • bruce smart: But it should mean that problem areas have been identified, should have been known already, and plans...
  • Jim Cripps: The essence of this development ( and my letter ) is they (RDC) only appear to be dealing with crossing...
  • John Mason: @Jim Cripps 10 I have asked Chris to find out whether the notable changes referred to in his article were...
  • Christine Paine: Of course if I were of a cynical turn of mind I could think this was to avoid coming face to face...
  • admin: Richard, the works here have dealt with troublespot on this watercourse, we now need to look downstream at...
  • Jim Cripps: CHRIS – running out of time , is it being called in ?, I’ve written to the Inspector direct...
  • Jim Cripps: Spot on mate – and did you know the most profitable premium rate is applied to each ‘pitch...
  • Jim Cripps: Probably aware ,via watching Facebook, that a lot of people were planning to attend on the back of...
  • richard lambourne: This a predictable response, but probably too little, what we would all like to hear is that a...
  • richard lambourne: W£hat a cop out please read this drivel and I leave you all to comment http://www.r...
  • richard lambourne: What we are missing here is the avoricious need to suck in the “New Homes Bonus” which...
  • John: It seems that the Environment Agency or whoever objected to this 2008 Developement were right, as there have...
  • The Mighty Oz: Folks, not the correct place for this post ( sorry ) but just in case you are unaware the road works...
  • Jim Cripps: Can someone cleverer at IT than me, please put on here the Surface Water Flood Map – Environmen...
  • Christine Paine: Last August, the incredibly wet winter, and Sunday afternoon. Three “once in a hundred...
  • Gordon Toal: Again our elected council are acting in an arrogant and foolhardy manner. The changes to the Development...

Recent Posts


Lib Dem logo
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law: This website is published and promoted by by Bruce Smart at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh, on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS

Technical Help : Graham Osborn

Posts with Most Comments

Categories

Categories

Asda or Makro Council Budget Crime & Policing District Core Strategy District Wide Elections Essex & East Future Housing Green Belt Highways & Parking History and Culture Hockley Hullbridge Leisure and Sport Liberal Democrats Local Democracy Local Facilities National Politics No Category Planning Applications Rawreth Rayleigh Rochford Web Stuff

The Core Strategy

This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here click here. (2.5mb)

Planning Applications…

If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.

If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.

Reporting A Problem

If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.

The Roads That Need Repairing


The County Council admitted in July that over 200 roads in our district need repairing! They say they will fix them by May 2013. Click here to see the list.

Essex Political Blogs

History

Lib Dem Websites

Local Council Websites

Local Info

Non-Political Stuff

Other Lib Dem Blogs

Planning Issues

Join Your Local Team

If you read onlineFOCUS for a while you can see the kind of things we are trying to achieve locally. Maybe you would like to help us?


If you fancy helping us deliver leaflets, or actively campaigning for us at election time, or simply just helping behind the scenes with paperwork, please contact the onlineFOCUS team here.

“Rayleigh was the birthplace of Britain’s first surviving quintuplets, but that’s just one of its many claims to fame”

When the Olympic Torch came to Rayleigh, Chris Black wrote about the town in the Guardian - read it here

Join the National Team

If you would like email updates on what the Lib Dems are doing nationally, click here.
If you would like to join the Lib Dems click here.

Meta