onlineFOCUS – News and Stuff For Rochford District since 2003

 

Archive for Planning Applications

Tescos Withdraws Application For Extended Hours

As Councillor Toby Mountain explains here Tescos have withdrawn their application for extended opening hours at their London Road , Rayleigh, store.

Rayleigh Town Council Discusses The 500 Homes Application

The Echo report is here.

by Philip Jones

BATTLE lines have been drawn over plans for 500 new homes west of Rayleigh as councillors insist the town cannot cope with extra traffic.

Developer Countryside has submitted an outline application to Rochford District Council, but Rayleigh town councillors strongly railed against the plans on the grounds of overdevelopment and a lack of adequate roads.

The town council argues righthand filter lanes, for access to the site between London Road and Rawreth Lane, simply will not cope with the extra traffic associated with 500 new homes.

Councillor Chris Lumley said: “In 1777, there was London Road, Rawreth Lane and Downhall Road, more than 200 years later these are still the same basic roads we use.

“They cannot cope with the current traffic in Rayleigh, adding 500 more homes and their cars, will be a nightmare.”

Recent roadworks to Beeches Bridge, Hullbridge, have closed Watery Lane and forced villagers to use Rawreth Lane, leading to long delays on that and surrounding roads.

Councillor Bruce Smart said: “One day there will be an emergency vehicle that will not be able to get where it needs to go because the correct roads have not been put in.”

Rayleigh Town Council’s planning committee voted, almost without objection, against the outline application and called for a full traffic survey to be carried out to assess the impact of the new homes.

Residents were allowed to speak at the beginning of the meeting, with all of them raising similar concerns over congestion.

Tim [sic] Cripps said: “Rawreth Lane is just that, a lane, it is not a highway.

“Putting T-junctions in there, and on London Road, will cause mayhem, to add to the chaos we already have.”

Chairman of the Rayleigh Action Group, Linda Kendall, of Lubbards Close, is currently waiting to hear the result of her High Court challenge to Rochford District Council, which could stop these homes being build.

She said: “We have to stop Countryside getting outline planning because once they do, they will just bulldoze everything else through.”

The outline application will be heard by a meeting of the Rochford District Council development committee on an, as yet, undecided date.

 

The Cabinet System Should Be Scrapped

brocksford

 

If anyone is looking at the District Council website to try to find out who initiated the idea to build houses on Brocksford Green – well it’s not easy!

But the decision seems to have been made by the Council Executive  (the Cabinet) back in December 2012 under “Asset Review”. The officers report was private and confidential , and isn’t shown on the council website. However these are the minutes(click on them to enlarge). We can’t be 100% that this was the decision, without seeking out a copy of the confidential paperwork.

 

asset minutes

As you can see, it deals with quite a few sites. Also note that this was a meeting of the cabinet, which at that time consisted on 8 councillors, all selected by Cllr Cutmore, none of them from Rayleigh!  Ordinary ward Councillors are NOT permitted to speak at cabinet meetings ! Which meant that no Rayleigh member could have spoken on this.

If the ward Councillors had wanted to challenge this decision – well, at that time any 3 councillors could have got together to refer it to Full Council. But none of them did. And by the way, that right of referral has since been taken away by the Conservatives.

It’s time the Cabinet system was scrapped. It’s undemocratic and expensive. And it’s not even that effective – if there had been an open debate involving all Councillors in 2012, the idea would have been squelched back then, saving council officers much-needed time and money.

Amenity Space Saved, Wakering Development Squeaks Through……

At tonight’s meeting of the Development Committee:

The outline  application for 6 dwellings on the amenity space at Brocksford Avenue was refused by an overwhelming vote of councillors. Refusal was moved by  Ian  Ward and seconded by Heather Glynn. This pleased the public gallery, which was packed with concerned residents.

The application for 116 dwellings at the old Star Lane Brickworks in Great Wakering was passed – but only just. This is another one of the big sites that has come forward as part of the local plan. Chris Black and Ron Oatham moved refusal, saying that the application was contrary to our core strategy, because extra funding for the local primary school wasn’t being provided. We lost the refusal  11-9. Interestingly , none of the ward councillors supported our refusal. Cllr Mrs Wilkins voted against our refusal , Cllr Hookway was absent and Cllr Seagers declared an interest and quite properly left the chamber.  A motion of approval was then moved and the scheme was passed 14-5

The District Council applied to itself for planning permission to install a banner in Bradley Way to advertise public events – and the committee refused this , on the grounds of it being a conservation area.

A New Arts And Crafts Centre In Rayleigh?

New planning application, just submitted:

arts and crafts centre

Brocksford Green Application

The District Council Development Committee has a meeting next week on September 25th, at 7:30 pm. One major item is the application from RDC itself to build 6 new homes on a bit of open space between Brocksford Avenue and Copford Avenue in Rayleigh. Local residents and Rayleigh Town Council are objecting…

 

You can find the officers report here  – it recommends approval.

The Echo have an article on it here.

Getting Your Comments In……

The District Council has sent out a number of ‘neighbour’ consultation letters on the North of London Road planning application. The official expiry date for replying is September 24th. But…..
You can still respond after that date!

If the council receives your response before the council officers finish their report it will be included in their report. But don’t expect your text to be quoted word for word. To keep things manageable when there are big responses, officers will write something like : “There have been x letters of objection, mainly on the reasons of a, b and c; and y letters of support “and then include a page or two of key quotes from some of those letters.

If they get your response after they have written their report it will be included in an ‘addendum’ produced the day before the planning meeting. The meeting could be in November or December…

You may wonder what is the point of responding (or coming to the meeting). Well, occasionally responses include information that councillors didn’t know about. But more often they simply add a bit of weight to a councillors arguments. If a councillor is trying get an extra condition included, or get an application altered, or get something included, or indeed get an application passed or refused, it’s hard to argue that this is a significant matter for the community if hardly anybody’s written in, or the public gallery is empty.

An Easier Way To Look At The “North Of London Road” Planning Application

nlrapp4

 

The District Council have now put the “North of London Road” planning application on a special page here. It describes the application and then give links to various documents. This is the text:

Land North of London Road and South of Rawreth Lane and West of Rawreth Industrial Estate –

Outline Planning Application

 

The Council has received a planning application from Countryside Properties (UK) Ltd  for the development of land to the west of Rayleigh. The exact site to which the proposal relates can be viewed online by following the link to the ‘Location Plan’ under Related Documents below.

The application is outline and consequently the matters to be determined at this stage include the acceptability of the principle of the proposed residential (and other) development including the amount of development proposed and the proposed access points. Detailed aspects of the scheme including the design and layout of the houses are matters which would be dealt with at a later date in a Reserved Matters application, if outline planning permission were to have been granted.

The outline proposal includes;

  • Residential development  including a proportion of affordable housing  
  • Associated open space, landscaping and drainage and infrastructure works
  • Land for a new primary school
  • Land for proposed non-residential  use including any of the following: Use Class A1(Retail), A3(Food and Drink), A4(Drinking Establishments), C2(Residential Institutions), D1a (Health or Medical Centre) or D1b (Crèche, Day Nursery or Day Centre)

The application form, plans and other documentation submitted by the applicant can be viewed as individual items via the individual links below under the Related Documents heading (near the bottom of the page).

You can also ask to view a hardcopy of the full application including all submitted documents and plans at the Council’s reception in South Street, Rochford. The reception is open 8:30am to 5:30pm Monday to Thursday and 8:30am to 5:00pm on Friday.

Your views on this application and comments can be sent either in writing (quoting reference 14/00627/OUT) or via the Council’s online planning system, a link for the system is near the bottom of the page.

If you would like to submit your comments online please use the link at the bottom of the page to the Council’s planning system. To find the application you will need to enter the following reference 14/00627/OUT into the application search facility.

The scale of the proposed development is such that the application constitutes major development and will go to a Development Committee for determination. Once a date for consideration of the application at a Development Committee has been finalised, details will be published on the website.

 

How To Find The “North Of London Road” Application Online

The application for housing “North of London Road” is now online.

 

You can find it by going to the District Council Website here and then typing in the application number 14/00627/OUT or just “London Road”. Then just click on the link that comes up:

nlrapp1

When you get to the application you will see there is a lot of information,. Here’s a few early observations:

1. This is an outline application. That means that most of the details will be decided later in a ‘reserved matters’ application. The only thing to be definitely decided is the road access to the site.

2. The title of the application is as follows:

“Outline Planning Application (with all Matters Reserved apart from Access) for the erection of Residential Development with associated Open Space, Landscaping, Parking, Servicing, Utilities, Footpath and Cycle Links, Drainage and Infrastructure Works, and Primary School. Provision of Non-Residential Floorspace to Part of Site, Uses including any of the following: Use Class A1(Retail), A3(Food and Drink), A4(Drinking Establishments), C2(Residential Institutions), D1a(Health or Medical Centre) or D1b(Crèche, Day Nursery or Day Centre).”

3. There is no date set for the when it will come to committee – probably November or December.

4. Neighbour consultations are supposed to be completed by September 24th.  You can leave comments by clicking on the tab marked ‘plans and comments’ and then following the instructions:

nlrapp2

 

 

5. To read the planning application itself, click on the tab marked ‘plans and comments’,then click on ‘view associated documents’ and then click on “Redacted – Planning application Form”:

nlrapp3

6. The applicants say that the land is within an area at risk of flooding, but say that it will not increase the flood risk elsewhere,

7. Their form indicates that there will be 325 houses to be sold at market value, 140 social rented housing and35 intermediate housing, giving a total of 500.

 

… and that’s just what’s in the application form, there’s a lot of other stuff to read , including Countryside’s supporting documents….which we will look at in the next few days.

 

 

 

Outline Application For “North Of London Road”

Countryside have now submitted an outline planning application for “North of London Road”. It is still being validated by the District Council planners, so we haven’t seen it yet , we’ll provide more info when we get it. But remember that all district councillors, including Chris and Ron, have to stay impartial until the meeting.

At a guess, it might come to the Development Committee in November for a decision.

The District Council have a webpage for “Major Residential Planning Applications”: http://www.rochford.gov.uk/planning/planning_applications/major_residential_planning_app

We would expect the application to appear on that page soon.

Now , This Is Interesting- An Inspector Goes Against County Highways Advice.

There’s been an interesting planning appeal in Fambridge, near the River Crouch. It concerns  a former shellfish packing station there in a very quiet country location. It is currently used for a business that repairs and refurbishes old damaged cars , and prepares them for export. Part of the buildings already had a general industrial use planning permission, the applicants wanted to use the rest of the site.

Officers recommended refusal on the following grounds – highways and noise nuisance:

fambridge 2

This was despite County Highways being happy about it:

fambridge 1

Councillors voted for refusal, and the applicants went to appeal. But the inspector agreed with the council on both points, and the appeal failed. It’s interesting to see what he wrote about County Highways advice:

fambridge 3

It often happens that councillors are concerned about the effect on highways of a planning application, even when County Highways officers think it is OK. You can expect councillors to mention this Fambridge planning application when a similar situation occurs again…!

Museum Planning Application

We’ve already written about the idea of a Rayleigh Museum, however the Echo has a useful update:

Local historian, founder of Rayleigh Through the Looking Glass and chairman of the Rayleigh Town Museum Working Party, Mike Davies, has found a suitable building for his project.

Mr Davies, Rayleigh citizen of the year, has been searching for years to find a suitable home for his archives of Rayleigh artefacts and now hopes to have found the perfect spot.

He has submitted a planning application to Rochford District Council for the first floor of 91-93 Rayleigh High Street above Yours clothing shop and now awaits the planning officers’ decision.

Mr Davies said: “This is the oldest secular building in Rayleigh High Street and is a Grade II listed building within the conservation area.

“The location and building is ideal for a Town Museum, and the owner has agreed to install a fully accessible passenger lift, before we take possession of the building on a long lease. We have a long way to go, with planning permission required, as well as a need for a Heritage Lottery Grant that we are in the process of applying for, but all the signs are good.”

As usual, Ron and Chris must stay neutral in advance of any planning meeting. The application also includes turning the ground floor into a restaurant or cafe, and you can find it here.

Choose the layout you want to see

October 2014
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Who We Are

We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click here to email us .

viewfrommount

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.



Daily Reporting by Chris Black

With support from:
Ron Oatham Ron Oatham Bruce Smart Bruce Smart Chris Stanley Chris Stanley

Latest Comments

  • Linda Kendall: Oz. Are you aware that on top of the huge expenses this lot voted for themselves our wonderful...
  • John Mason: Will it be possible (likely?) for Landlords to pass on these additional costs to them in increased rental...
  • Sean: From the Echo article: In January, 70 per cent of Basildon’ s streetlights were switched off saving...
  • The Mighty Oz: Take a look at this people….I can think of one cut back straight away… http://www.e...
  • Linda Kendall: Jim @ 2 above. I think we in Rayleigh Action Group need a pat on the back for achieving what no one...
  • admin: Hi Bruce the link is below. – chapter 6 is the summary: http://www.roch ford.gov.uk/sit es/rochford....
  • JIM Cripps: Let us not forget that the Chief ( Cutmore )and Deputy Chief ( Hudson ) Councillors made a pledge ( in...
  • bruce smart: Admin Do you have the figures for the amount of pitches that should be provided by the local authority...
  • admin: Yes, you are right Jim, should have done it by now, sorry. The “view planning applications 221; pages...
  • Jim Cripps: ADMIN @ 15 – can we get the RTSSC objection on here please….. ?
  • Christine Paine: Unfortunately there is no legal obligation for riders to clear up horse poo as, unlike dog poo, it...
  • Linda Kendall: Oz. Ask Asda they will have a camera on the cash machines. It would be in their interest if this is...
  • A.Matthews: Once upon a time people would fight over horse poo for their gardens but now of course there are hardly...
  • Corey Vost: I do recall when we moved into our property I had a telephone conversation with a Planning Officer at RDC...
  • Christine Paine: Admin, thanks but I don’t think it would necessarily help. During the day satnav seems to...
  • The Mighty Oz: HORSE POO ! Not sure if this is the right place for this post but, if you own the horse that poops not...
  • Greenbelt: Admin, My recollection was that house numbers in Rawreth Lane coincided wuth the introduction of post...
  • admin: Good question, not sure of the answer. Though I vaguely recall that some years ago. – maybe 20- RDC were...
  • admin: Have emailed county highways twice since your lat comment re Priory Chase Corey, don,t seem to have had a...
  • Corey Vost: So is it the responsibility of the Council to ensure emergency services (or anyone for that matter) can...
  • bruce smart: The decisions are made but afterwards the unforeseen problems arise. We could say that these issues...
  • Jim Cripps: Presumably Labour sided with Tory because they are both frightened of UKIP – and that is a good...
  • Christine Paine: We have that problem in our road Linda. No numbers, just names. It was bad enough at night when we...
  • Linda Kendall: Bruce. Part of my objection to the OUTLINE PLANNING APPLICATION ON RAWRETH LANE / LONDON ROAD...

Recent Posts


Lib Dem logo
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law: This website is published and promoted by by Bruce Smart at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh, on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS

Technical Help : Graham Osborn

Posts To Remember

Categories

Categories

Asda or Makro Council Budget Crime & Policing District Core Strategy District Wide Elections Essex & East Future Housing Green Belt Highways & Parking History and Culture Hockley Hullbridge Leisure and Sport Liberal Democrats Local Democracy Local Facilities National Politics No Category Planning Applications Rawreth Rayleigh Rochford Web Stuff YouTube and Video

500 HOUSES BETWEEN LONDON ROAD AND RAWRETH LANE

There's lots of information on the District Council website about the planning application "North of London Road ". To see it , just click here.

The Core Strategy

This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here click here. (2.5mb)

Planning Applications…

If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.

If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.

Reporting A Problem

If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.

Essex Political Blogs

Geography, History , Science

Lib Dem Websites

Local Council Websites

Local History

Local Info

Non-Political Stuff

Other Lib Dem Blogs

Planning Issues

Join Your Local Team

If you read onlineFOCUS for a while you can see the kind of things we are trying to achieve locally. Maybe you would like to help us?


If you fancy helping us deliver leaflets, or actively campaigning for us at election time, or simply just helping behind the scenes with paperwork, please contact the onlineFOCUS team here.

“Rayleigh was the birthplace of Britain’s first surviving quintuplets, but that’s just one of its many claims to fame”

When the Olympic Torch came to Rayleigh, Chris Black wrote about the town in the Guardian - read it here

Join the National Team

If you would like email updates on what the Lib Dems are doing nationally, click here.
If you would like to join the Lib Dems click here.

Meta