onlineFOCUS – News and Stuff For Rochford District since 2003

 

Archive for Housing

Empty Properties And The Council Tax

houses2

There were a few interesting items at last night’s Full District Council Meeting.

One of them was about the reductions in Council Tax that apply if properties are left empty.

The government has given councils the freedom to reduce these rebates – so that people concerned have to pay more. This means that councils get more money, and more homes are occupied (which to an extent reduces the need to build new homes). From next April there will be the following changes in Rochford District:

  • Second Homes will no longer get a 10% discount – the full amount will have to be paid instead
  • Vacant properties in need of urgent repair currently get a full 100% discount for the first 12 months – this will be reduced to 50% for 12 months.
  • Empty and unfurnished properties currently have a a full 100 % discount for up to 6 months. This is being reduced to a 100% discount for only one month. This discount will now only apply immediately following a period when the property was occupied for a minimum of 6 weeks. It will also be restricted to a maximum of two awards in any one financial year.
  • Properties that are empty and “substantially unfurnished” for two years or more will now get an extra 50% “premium charge” on top of the normal 100% council tax amount.

These changes could lead to the district council getting around £195,000 extra council tax per year. Though in reality it is likely to be lower than this because property owners may change their behaviour.

It would be interesting to know if Southend Borough Council are doing the same thing – because as Julian Ware Lane pointed out here there are certainly plenty of empty properties in Southend.

Empty Homes In Rochford District


Michael and Diane Hoy write about empty homes here:

As she walks around Hullbridge (the Ward she represents) Diane makes a note of all those which appear empty and reports them to the Council.  However she has so far been disappointed in the progress by the council in making those homes available to the public, either to rent or to buy.

We have obtained the figures for empty homes in the Rochford District.  They are set out below.

Total no. of empty properties:               1,021
Properties empty for over 6 months:     575
Properties empty for over 1 year:            375

 

 

 

The full article is worth a read, especially with its reference to the core strategy.

Two Questionnaires !

The District Council have an online survey on their car parks – you can find it on this page.

They also have a questionnaire for people seeking affordable housing on the same page.

[we have amended this page to show usable links]

House Prices In Our District Are Higher Than In 2007 – One Of Only TWO Places In the UK

From the BBC website:

Average house prices have risen in just two local authority areas since the UK’s property boom peaked in 2007, research suggests.
_
According to the Halifax bank, the only two areas to increase were Rochford in Essex and South Lakeland in Cumbria.
_
Even in the areas that saw an increase, the rises were “marginal” according to the report – 1% in Rochford and 0.1% South Lakeland.

House price changes

* Rochford +1% (average £231,595)
* South Lakeland +0.1% (£212,457)
* Islington -1% (£470,206)
* Hart -1% (£326,555)
* Spelthorne -2% (278,216)
* Worthing -3% (£216,435)
* Ceredigion -3% (£177,968)
* Windsor and Maidenhead -3% (£396,826)
* Hillingdon -3% (£272,699)
* Derbyshire Dales -4% (£249,189)
* Brent -4% (£335,574)

Source: Halifax, 2007-2011

BREAKING NEWS: Rochford Housing Application Passed

The outline application for 600 homes north of Hall Road, Rochford, was passed tonight.

A more detailed report tomorrow….

New Housing Allocation Policy

Ever wondered how the District Council allocates social housing to people?

There’s a new policy arrangement proposed here – unles it’s ‘called in’ in the next few days, it will come into effect.

Here’s some lengthy extracts:

2.1
The draft Housing Allocation Policy has been out to consultation with
Registered Social Landlords, and from the feedback received, minor
amendments have been incorporated into the final document.
2.2
The Council’s current Housing Allocation Policy requires updating and it is
now considered to be an opportune time for this to be carried out, as the
Council is also about to due to implement the new Choice Based Lettings
scheme in June 2011 and the two schemes / policies are intrinsically linked.
2.3
The current Allocation Policy is based on applicants to the Council’s Housing
Register being awarded various amounts of points, in relation to meeting a
range of criteria such as local connection, residency, medical needs, numbers
in household, inadequacy of present accommodation, time on register etc.
2.4
The new Allocation Policy will be much simpler and more transparent, whilst
aiming to give applicants an element of choice as to where they live. Once an
applicant has completed the appropriate application form, if they are eligible,
they will be placed in one of the five bands, A – E, according to their housing
need and connection with the district, as detailed in Appendix A.

The Council does not own any housing stock. All social housing in the district is owned and managed by housing associations, and the Council has agreements with many of these, enabling it to nominate prospective tenants to vacancies that arise.
There are relatively low levels of social housing in the district and although the Council is continually working with housing associations to provide more accommodation, only a limited number of vacancies arise each year. Priority is therefore given to those applicants with the highest need, who have a local connection with the Rochford District and who do not have the financial resources to meet their housing costs. Consequently many applicants will have no realistic prospect of being nominated in the foreseeable future.

The majority of applicants will be placed in one of 5 bands, A to E, according to their housing need and their connection with the district. A limited number of these applicants will then be invited to ‘bid’ (express an interest) in a property when it becomes vacant. Nominees will be selected from those who bid. Because of the low number of vacancies, bids are only likely to be invited from applicants in bands A, B or C.

Applications will be placed in one of five bands from A to E, according to housing need and local connection. Within each band the active date will be the determining factor.
Band A (Urgent priority)
Homelessness
• Applicants owed a duty by the Council under section 193(2) of the Housing Act 1996 (or section 65(2) or 68(2) of the Housing Act 1985).
Environmental
• Applicants occupying insanitary housing or otherwise living in unsatisfactory housing conditions where repairs/improvements are unlikely to be completed in a reasonable period of time.
• Applicants living in accommodation that is statutorily overcrowded. Care leavers/move on

Applicants leaving care provided by a Local Authority under the Children Acts (or other statutory duty).

Applicants ready to move on from schemes the Council had referred them to or where the Council would have a housing duty on leaving.
Medical or Welfare
• Applicants awarded an A grade.
Violence/Harassment
• Applicants suffering persistent harassment, violence or abuse.
Band B (High priority)
Threatened Homelessness
• Applicants who are owed a duty under section 195 (2) of the 1996 Act (priority need and not threatened with homelessness intentionally).
Medical/Welfare
• Applicants awarded a B grade.
Need to move
• Applicants who need to move to a particular locality in the district where failure to meet that need would cause hardship to themselves or others.
Band C (Moderate priority)
Other Homelessness
• Applicants who are homeless (within the meaning of Part 7 of the 1996 Act) including people who are owed a duty by the Council under
7
section 190(2) (intentional homelessness), or occupying
accommodation secured by the Council under section 192(3) (no
priority need but not intentionally homeless).
Medical/ Welfare
• Applicants awarded a C grade. Environmental

Applicants lacking 1 or more bedrooms (non –statutory overcrowding).

Applicants occupying insanitary housing or otherwise living in unsatisfactory housing conditions where repairs/improvements are likely to be completed in a reasonable period of time.
Sharing/lacking facilities
• Applicants sharing facilities with persons other than the applicant’s household.
Band D (low priority)
• Applicants with a housing need but no local connection.
Band E (no priority)

Applicants with no housing need.

Applicants who have sufficient financial resources to resolve their housing situation.

Transfers
Existing social tenants living in the district who do not have any housing need but wish to either down-size or move to another part of the district will be placed on a separate list, providing the Council has nomination rights to the resulting vacancy in the event of a move. Applications will be placed in the following order of priority.
1) number of bedrooms given up;
2) moving from general needs housing to older persons housing or sheltered accommodation;
3) moving to a similar size property.
Where applicants have equal priority, the active date will be the determining factor.
Existing social tenants with a housing need will be placed in one of the five bands referred to above.

Michael Hoy’s Enhanced Role

Green party Councillor Michael Hoy has made a definite impact in his first 12 months. So we were pleased to see him volunteer to join the board of the Rochford Housing Association.

He’ll be very useful in that role. And credit to the Conservatives for letting him go on the board.

Flats and Shops Update

We were asked last week about the front of the Asda site in Rawreth Lane Rayleigh. We have had the following update from an officer at the District Council:

“The recent signage announcing the new development relates to the mixed use building comprising three commercial units at ground floor with 23 affordable flats that was granted permission at the meeting of 25th February 2010 under application reference 10/00021/FUL. It is the scheme that incorporates a roof garden but with the more domestic design that members considered better.”

We understand that the partners Sanctuary are keen to show their involvement. The development is due to commence shortly so the signage has gone up…

When the scheme was passed last year we wrote on onlinefocus:

The latest application was for 3 commercial units and 23 affordable flats in a more traditional, attractive design that we thought fitted in much better with Rawreth Lane. They provided extra garden space by having roof gardens.
.
Ron and Chris had the chance to meet with Coral and a council officer soon after the application went in, to get a better understanding of the scheme and suggest some improvements. For example:
# There is a condition that ‘no amplified speech or music shall be broadcast on the open areas of the site.
# There is an extra planting area / barrier at the northern end of the roof garden to prevent easy overlooking onto Rawreth Lane.
# The height of the stairwells on the roof has been reduced.
# There is a condition to prevent the three small commercial units from being converted into one big takeaway
.
Under the planning rules, Chris and Ron couldn’t confer in advance of the meeting. But we came to similar conclusions:
# disappointment that we haven’t got a building of more benefit to the general community
# a feeling that the latest building was more attractive to look at and offered a better quality of life for those living there
# some uncertainty as how the roof gardens will work out in practice
# a feeling that this was the best we could get here!

To Finish 2010 On A Positive Note….

… a new press release from the Rochford Housing Association:

A family from Rayleigh, Essex, is celebrating the festive season in a newly-renovated home thanks to Rochford Housing Association.
.
Thanks to the association’s aids and adaptations scheme, the Holyland family home has benefitted from a new, purpose-built extension. This will enable the family to provide the best possible care for their wheelchair-bound son, Harrison, who suffers from a rare degenerative condition, Emanuel Syndrome.
.
The work included an extension to the side and rear of the property to accommodate a ground-floor bedroom and wet room for Harrison. The home’s kitchen and family room were also improved, with ramps and widened door frames added to allow easy access for Harrison’s wheelchair.
.
Improvements began in June and were completed in October so that the Holylands could move back into their new home in time for Christmas.
.
Mum, Miss Tracy Holyland, said: “Our new extension has made life for all of us much easier. We now don’t have to carry Harrison up and down the stairs and we have the space to spend time together as a family and offer him more independence.”

Connaught

As you may know, the environmental and property business Connaught has gone into liquidation.

This has an impact on the Rochford Housing Association because of Connaught’s social housing division’s involvement in maintainance and home improvement.

We’ve checked with the District Council, who tell us that there were 20 homes in Rayleigh currently undergoing works. These works have temporarily been halted, but the RHA have visited each of the homes, spoken to the tenants and are arranaging for the works to be finished.

We understand that any future planned works, in other homes, as part of the overall Rochford Standard Programme, will still be delivered.

Empty Homes In Rochford District

These are the latest figures:

Total empty homes 1097
Of those, empty over 6 months 639

(Of the total 37 are second homes)

Thousands Of Empty Homes In Southend

Labour campaigner Julian Ware-Lane writes about it here.

Choose the layout you want to see

July 2014
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Who We Are

We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click here to email us .

viewfrommount

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.



Daily Reporting by Chris Black

With support from:
Ron Oatham Ron Oatham Bruce Smart Bruce Smart Chris Stanley Chris Stanley

Latest Comments

  • admin: Richard, the works here have dealt with troublespot on this watercourse, we now need to look downstream at...
  • Jim Cripps: CHRIS – running out of time , is it being called in ?, I’ve written to the Inspector direct...
  • Jim Cripps: Spot on mate – and did you know the most profitable premium rate is applied to each ‘pitch...
  • Jim Cripps: Probably aware ,via watching Facebook, that a lot of people were planning to attend on the back of...
  • richard lambourne: This a predictable response, but probably too little, what we would all like to hear is that a...
  • richard lambourne: W£hat a cop out please read this drivel and I leave you all to comment http://www.r...
  • richard lambourne: What we are missing here is the avoricious need to suck in the “New Homes Bonus” which...
  • John: It seems that the Environment Agency or whoever objected to this 2008 Developement were right, as there have...
  • The Mighty Oz: Folks, not the correct place for this post ( sorry ) but just in case you are unaware the road works...
  • Jim Cripps: Can someone cleverer at IT than me, please put on here the Surface Water Flood Map – Environmen...
  • Christine Paine: Last August, the incredibly wet winter, and Sunday afternoon. Three “once in a hundred...
  • Gordon Toal: Again our elected council are acting in an arrogant and foolhardy manner. The changes to the Development...
  • Jim Cripps: It is all very well but it’s all after the event stuff – what is needed is a recognition that...
  • Jim Cripps: A.Matthews – any more details on the ‘ problem at Eon Site’ please, this is critical...
  • richard lambourne: Janet Warner The particlar thing about this subject is that largely it shouldnt cost local...
  • admin: I visited 3 locations yesterday afternoon, ( Canterbury Close, Trenders Avenue and Laburnum Way ) will write...
  • Janet Warner: Has anyone checked the result of yesterdays downpour? To a degree it was so heavy that it came down...
  • richard lambourne: So Chris Black and Chris Lumley was this work a success yesterday ??
  • richard lambourne: I have refferred the matter to my two Tory Councillors Messrs Smith nd Dray, but dont expect any...
  • A.Matthews: I am told by a resident that Salem Close houses escaped by a whisker because the residents cleared some...
  • Christine Paine: What everyone forgets Jim is that this area is riddled with underground streams. In the “good...
  • Christine Paine: I am amazed at this. I would have thought that Policy LT21 especially the bit about noise and...
  • Jim Cripps: Look East news tonight – Flooding in Rayleigh this afternoon , same place as last year but...
  • James: So Chris so you intend to call this in if you can get support of other councillors?

Recent Posts


Lib Dem logo
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law: This website is published and promoted by by Bruce Smart at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh, on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS

Technical Help : Graham Osborn

Posts with Most Comments

Categories

Categories

Asda or Makro Council Budget Crime & Policing District Core Strategy District Wide Elections Essex & East Future Housing Green Belt Highways & Parking History and Culture Hockley Hullbridge Leisure and Sport Liberal Democrats Local Democracy Local Facilities National Politics No Category Planning Applications Rawreth Rayleigh Rochford Web Stuff

The Core Strategy

This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here click here. (2.5mb)

Planning Applications…

If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.

If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.

Reporting A Problem

If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.

The Roads That Need Repairing


The County Council admitted in July that over 200 roads in our district need repairing! They say they will fix them by May 2013. Click here to see the list.

Essex Political Blogs

History

Lib Dem Websites

Local Council Websites

Local Info

Non-Political Stuff

Other Lib Dem Blogs

Planning Issues

Join Your Local Team

If you read onlineFOCUS for a while you can see the kind of things we are trying to achieve locally. Maybe you would like to help us?


If you fancy helping us deliver leaflets, or actively campaigning for us at election time, or simply just helping behind the scenes with paperwork, please contact the onlineFOCUS team here.

“Rayleigh was the birthplace of Britain’s first surviving quintuplets, but that’s just one of its many claims to fame”

When the Olympic Torch came to Rayleigh, Chris Black wrote about the town in the Guardian - read it here

Join the National Team

If you would like email updates on what the Lib Dems are doing nationally, click here.
If you would like to join the Lib Dems click here.

Meta