4 Responses to “The Good News For People On Low Pay….”
December 30th, 2012 at 08:12
….and there was I imagining that we have a Coalition government, that the Chancellor George Osborne is responsible for taxation matters and that he is a Conservative… I never knew we had a LibDem government, they must have won soooo many more seats in Westminster than first reported in 2010.
Oh dear, just woken up in the shower (‘Dallas’ style for those with longer memories!!) and it was simply LibDem cherrypicking of Coalition policies, yet again!
Happy New Year to all from the Coalition’s Conservatives.
Yes , we have a coalition government,which is why I put this in the category ‘Coalition Government’. But this has been a particular Lib Dem aim for a quite a few years, which is why I also put this in the “Liberal Democrats” category.
If you don’t believe me, maybe you’ll believe Norman Tebbit, who wrote the following in the Telegraph in 2010:
I hate to say it, but only one party leader seems to have grasped that, if you construct a system where unskilled people are worse off by taking a job than by staying on welfare, they remain trapped in poverty – and that is Nick Clegg. Lord knows, Frank Field and Iain Duncan Smith spelled it out in words and figures that only a simpleton could fail to understand, but the two main parties are unwilling to bite on the bullet and commit themseves to raising the income tax threshold from £6,475 to something like £10,000 or £12,000.
It is madness to claim that people so poor that they need welfare payments are at the same time sufficiently well-off to pay income tax. The effect is that people at the bottom of the stack living on benefits who try to get back into work are hit by 20 per cent tax, 11 per cent National Insurance and benefit losses that can add up to amost 100 pence in the pound. It is all very well for the better-off to complain about the disincentive effect of losing 50 per cent of every extra pound they earn, but what about the poor devil at the bottom of the stack who loses 90 per cent?
It need not cost that much. There would be a huge saving in benefits if we got those people back into work. We could redeploy all those people shuffling paper and money around the tax and benefit system to some useful work. And it would be easy enough to lower the 40 per cent threshold so that better-off people did not benefit from the increase in the basic rate threshold – so why don’t “the party of the workers” or “the party which believes in incentives” say they’ll do it? Why leave it to the Lib Dems, who are not going to have the power to do it?
We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click hereto email us .
We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.
Daily Reporting by Chris Black
With support from:
A.Matthews: They (politicians) must think we are stupid falling for the usual sound bites,unfortuna tely some do .It...
Linda Kendall: Policy on the back of a fag packet (sorry probably an opera programme) as usual. Please don’t...
Peter Scott: Indeed so Chris. Thatchers blunder was serious enough but this one defies logic. I am not against RTB...
Oz the Positive: Forget Pitt the Remote, meet Pitt the Invisible… ;.he could give Gino a run for his money in...
James Newport: I have a question too – will you turn up to any public events or is it too far from Cambridge?...
Christine Paine: I agree, this is a very badly thought through Policy, but what can you expect. Jim has said we need...
bruce smart: For years I have been asking for a slip road from Rawreth Lane into Hullbridge Road so traffic can ease...
Chris Black: I agree Peter. I imagine there will be a few Tory councillors around the country considering switching...
Jim Cripps: Are they taking the Micky or what 😋 . I watched a low-loader Lorry , coming from Hullbridge turn right...
Peter Scott: The whole policy is not only badly thought through but is also reckless. We have seen the damage to the...
Oz the Positive: I have a question, why did you not turn up at Sweyne School for the hustings ? Was it too far to...
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law:
This website is published and promoted by Stephen Tellis at 22 Beech Av, Rayleigh, SS6 8AE on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at c/o 22 Beech Av, Rayleigh
The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS
There's lots of information on the District Council website about the planning application "North of London Road ".
To see it , just click here.
The Core Strategy
This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here
click here. (2.5mb)
If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.
If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.
Reporting A Problem
If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.
Food Hygiene Ratings
To find the food hygiene rating for eating places and other businesses in our district , click here.