onlineFOCUS – News and Stuff For Rochford District since 2003

 

September 5th, 2013 |

“The Liberal Democrat Opposition is concerned about public safety and want consideration given to other lighting technology.”

On Jan 1st next year the County Council is planning to introduce ‘part-night’ lighting. Streetlights will be turned off from midnight until 5 am . You can find more information here on the County Council website, But for simplicity we are copying a lot of information from the County Council website onto onlinefocus (these are the County’s words, not ours). As you will see below, Lib Dem County Councillors  think the County Council should be looking at other lighting technology instead of just turning the lights off.

Why move to part-night lighting

To save money and reduce our carbon emissions and light pollution, we will be turning off some of our street lights at night – this is called part-night street lighting. This involves some lights being switched off for five hours over night, between 12am and 5am.

Pilot schemes

Essex County Council has been running a pilot part-night lighting scheme in Maldon and Uttlesford since early 2007. Street lights are switched off between 12 midnight and 5am, with some exceptions such as town centres, key road junctions and accident cluster sites. Since the pilot scheme began there has been no increase in recorded crime or road collisions in the two districts. The pilot has also delivered energy savings of 20% (approx £70,000 per annum).

Why are our lights being ‘turned off’?

Essex County Council is changing from all night lighting to part night lighting on certain street lights. This is in accordance with ECC exception criteria to help reduce energy consumption and light pollution. It is proposed to turn the lights off between midnight and 5am.

Can Essex County Council legally turn off lights?

Yes, Essex County Council is empowered as a lighting authority to light roads which in their opinion should be lit, but the Council is not duty bound to provide lighting in any road.


Why can’t you only switch off every other light? (1 in 2)

This has been considered but will not enable the Council to meet its objectives of reducing energy consumption and light pollution.

Why not replace the lighting with new technology such as solar powered lighting?

New technology like LED’s and solar power is currently not suitable for highway lighting in Essex as it is uneconomical. However Essex County Council will continue to monitor this.

Can I pay to keep the street light outside my house on?

No, part night lighting is to help reduce ECC’s energy consumption and light pollution.


Will I get a reduction in my council tax?

No however this initiative may help to reduce any future council tax increases.


When will the part night lighting start in my area?

This will be carried out in a rolling program following consultation with the Borough, District, Town and Parish Councils. Details will be published accordingly.

Why my street?

All areas of the county are being affected. The general presumption will be that all ECC owned street lights will be altered to part night operation unless covered by the exception criteria.

What are the exception criteria?

Major lit inter urban dual carriageway traffic routes.

Conflict sites e.g. roundabouts, lit by columns greater than 6m high.

Sites where street lights installed for accident remedial measures.

Town Centre type development where there is one or more of the following features:Main approaches to areas defined in the section above, where there is a mix of development between residential and commercial/industrial i.e. not exclusively residential.
CCTV sites
High proportion of high security premises e.g. banks, jewellers etc.
High crime risk
High concentration of people at night such as Transport interchanges, nightclubs etc.

Sites where the police can demonstrate that there will be an increase in crime if the lights are switched off.

Remote footpaths and alleys linking residential streets.

Where there is a statutory requirement.

Where the configuration of street lighting columns is considered excessive, consideration is to be given to removing 1 in 2 lights with the remaining lights left on full night operation

What about resident safety?

ECC part night lighting pilot in Maldon & Uttlesford Districts has demonstrated that changing to part night lighting has had no adverse effect on resident safety.

What happens if there is an increase in crime/accident levels where part night lighting is in operation?

Essex Police can ask for lights to be turned back on if they demonstrate that there has been a significant increase in crime due to the introduction of part night lighting. Individual/public requests will not be considered. Although, Crime is not expected to increase due to the scheme. Crime statistics recorded during the trial showed no significant change due to the installation of part-night lighting in the two districts. The number of offences occurring between 11.30pm and 5.30am actually dropped by 14% in Maldon and by 12.6% in Uttlesford. Since the pilot scheme began there has also been no demonstrable increase in road collisions. If you do have concerns about this please contact the Police.

What about people who are partially sighted, elderly, start work early or finish late?

The introduction of part night lighting is not based on personal circumstances. Part night lighting will be implemented in accordance with the exception criteria.

If a member of the public has a fall in a part night lit street during the hours when the lights are off will their claim be treated differently?

No, all claims are treated the same.

What happens if the cost of my car/home insurance increases due to part night lighting?

This is a matter between the person and their insurance company.

How can requests be made to turn lights back on?

If you feel your road is covered by the exception criteria please email or write to the Essex Highways street lighting team at:

partnightlighting@essexhighways.org, or
Street Lighting Team, Essex Highways, PO Box 11 County Hall, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 1LX

Have the emergency services been consulted?

The emergency services will be consulted about the plans to install part night lighting and their comments will be carefully considered.


In my area the street lights go out at midnight, how come other lighting is still on at this time?

Not all lighting is owned and maintained by ECC, only ECC lighting is considered under the exception criteria.

Who do I contact for further information regarding part night lighting?

Please email Essex Highways street lighting team at partnightlighting@essexhighways.org or write to Street Lighting Team, Essex Highways, PO Box 11, County Hall, Chelmsford, Essex CM1 1LX.

 

Stephen Robinson , one of the Lib Dem County Councillors in Chelmsford has now  ‘called-in’ the decision :

Essex County Council will review its plans to switch off street lights, following a “call in” request from Lib Dem Highways spokesman Cllr Stephen Robinson. The review will be at the Place Services Scrutiny Committee on Thursday 26th September, 10am at County Hall, Chelmsford. (When ready, the Agenda will be here.)

Most street lights in Chelmsford and Braintree are now switched off between Midnight and 5am. The Liberal Democrat Opposition is concerned about public safety and want consideration given to other lighting technology.

Stephen Robinson said, “We think that Essex CC should consider new-style, low-energy LED lights, lights controlled by movement sensors and other technology.

“We know that the council has to save money and should also reduce its carbon footprint. But LED lights would reassure the public and be a more effective kind of lighting.”

A petition backing calls for a review has been launched at http://signme.org.uk/860

The Cabinet Member for Highways, Cllr Rodney Bass, made the formal decision on 27 August and Lib Dem Stephen Robinson then used the Council’s official “Call In” procedure. This required Cllr Bass to meet with Cllr Robinson and Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee Cllr Simon Walsh.

Following their meeting on Tuesday 3rd September, Cllr Walsh agreed to Cllr Robinson’s request for street lighting to be the main item at a Committee meeting on 26th September. Cllr Bass agreed to attend to answer questions from councillors.

Cllr Robinson added, “Unfortunately, the Conservatives do not allow the public to speak at Essex County Council meetings. So, while anyone can attend the meeting, only Councillors can ask questions. I will request that a Task & Finish Group is formed, which then CAN take evidence from the public and technical experts.”

Essex County Council plans to switch off lights across the rest of the Essex over the next few months.

 

9 Responses to ““The Liberal Democrat Opposition is concerned about public safety and want consideration given to other lighting technology.””

  1. 1
    Ruthie:

    I wonder…had the pilot scheme been introduced in Basildon, the results would have been a lot different……..

  2. 2
    Christine Paine:

    The travellers are going to love having the lights off when they get their new site aren’t they.

  3. 3
    The Mighty Oz:

    Can I be the only person that feels that the people making decisions, both at local and national level, have a complete disconnect with the people affected by those decisions

  4. 4
    Christine Paine:

    Oz, no you’re not. In fact I put an open question to any and all Councillors reading this site about their feeling on the disengagement between the general population and RDC. Chris Black was the only one who bothered answering, which sort of proves the ppoint.

  5. 5
    Chris Black:

    Oz -There are disconnects running in every direction, between residents, councils and the bureaucrats of central government.

    To give another example of this, central government keeps churning out new directives and rules on the planning system – not only on what should and shouldn’t be allowed, but also on the rules for processing planning applications and appeals. It doesn’t make the work of our planning department, and our planning officers any easier.

  6. 6
    John Mason:

    @Christine Paine #4

    I am a District Councillor for Hawkwell West. I have been re-elected 4 times by electors. I have been a Member for 13 years. And I am independendent of all of the national political parties.

    I do not read this site everyday and not everything that is displayed on it.

    Whilst I did not use your words “a disengagement between the general population and RDC” I raised this issue on the first day of the Hearings on the Allocation of Sites DPD with the Inspector.

    The style and depth of engagement between RDC and residents of the District is, as an organisation, controlled by the Administration of the Council which consists of the majority political control and the leadership of the paid senior Officers.

    Personally I have made a sort of crusade about making sure that the residents that I directly represent in my Ward have extra communication and engagement by use of the diversity of media available for me to deploy at my cost to which is added, when necessary, public meetings, face to face meetings with groups of local residents and newsletters/leaflets delivered to each household.

    Sometimes I am able to help other groups of residents, at their request, in other parts of the District.

    I want to put across my independent take on what information I think that as a resident I would personally wish to have and to be able to express, if I wanted to, my view as a resident and feed that back to the Council and my local councillors. I then find ways of amplifying the views of residents in my role as a Member.

    That is what I do and there are quite a number of Members that do the same. Some do not and rely on what the Council does as a corporate body.

  7. 7
    Ruthie:

    Whilst I think this discussion is great, can we get back to the lighting situation! I have spoken to a lot of residents about this and there are very mixed feelings. Most people have said that if this does go ahead, they will be installing extra lighting around their homes in order to feel safe and secure and keep these on all night. Yes the council will ultimately be making a saving but the costs will actually be residents paying out for extra lights and running them! This will not be reducing any carbon footprint…..only the council will benefit here.

  8. 8
    Christine Paine:

    I can appreciate some of the reasoning behind switching off street lights at times when not that many people are out and about, but there is the security of residents to consider. Dark roads will make it easier for burglars and muggers. There will be accidents, traffic tends to be faster on quiet roads late at night and cyclists will be even harder to spot with no street lights. No doubt while the Council are busy switching the lights off shops and office blocks will still be blazing with lights all through the night.

  9. 9
    Jason Richer:

    Will all the potholes that are littering Rayleigh in general and I note now two roads in particular – Lansdowne Drive and Purleigh Road be repaired prior to the lights being switched off? If not can we have a commensurate reduction in our council tax bills. All this will do is force individual residents to erect increased lighting at their own cost and expense. You can quote crime & safety statistics all you like but they can be manipulated to reflect any proposal. You keep making these savings for the council yet residents council tax either goes up or remains static – why?

    As regards a disconnect between local councils/national govt and the general public – you really have no idea at all as to how wide this gaping chasm of disconnect has become.

Leave a Reply


− four = 2

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

Choose the layout you want to see

October 2014
M T W T F S S
« Sep    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Who We Are

We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click here to email us .

viewfrommount

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.



Daily Reporting by Chris Black

With support from:
Ron Oatham Ron Oatham Bruce Smart Bruce Smart Chris Stanley Chris Stanley

Latest Comments

  • The Mighty Oz: Jim, I so want to believe you but I don’t think it will make any difference, I really hope I am...
  • Jim Cripps: Oz , as I said in first post the battle is’nt won with a court victory but , If Linda wins it will...
  • Linda Kendall: Oz @ 5. Exactly right Oz. We do not underestimate the task we were set and realise it may be too huge...
  • bruce smart: Good outcome for the residents of our area. Hope all of us are vigilant in preventing a Dale Farm type...
  • A.Matthews: Shame RDC did not take action all those years ago with the Bedloes site when warned by the parish council...
  • The Mighty Oz: So RDC could be forced to repeat the consultation exercise and then ignore the results and go ahead...
  • admin: Well spotted , thank you. Should read ‘7217R 17; – have corrected it now.
  • A.Matthews: Greenbelt I do not know what happened with the Rawreth Lane figures but the 72 should read 7217 westbound...
  • Greenbelt: Admin, I assisted with the Rawreth Lane traffic survey in 2010 but do not understand the figure...
  • Linda Kendall: For those unaware. RDC have a SCI (Statement of Community Involvement) which requires them to consult...
  • admin: Well, the responses are collected by RDC and go straight to the inspector. He is supposed to read them...
  • admin: Why not? Thats how Facebook does it.
  • The Mighty Oz: Er, Admin, that’s a Lib Doomed response if ever there was one. You cannot please everybody, man...
  • admin: Not keen on having a ‘downvote ’ button, that might discourage people from commenting. Maybe an...
  • The Mighty Oz: Apologies to all the regulars if this is obvious but….even if RDC had conducted the consultation...
  • The Mighty Oz: Invisible @29, probably best you try the ECHO web site…R 30;more your style.
  • admin: Invisible at 29- I think your point is made… probably no need to repeat it again…
  • richard lambourne: One point Chris Lumley failed to point out was that the road layout may date from 1777, was that...
  • The Invisible MF: 500 new homes in Rayleigh ??? This is news to me !!! . Flooding in Rayleigh ??? Where ? When ?...
  • bruce smart: Cause for celebration, Why? The return of the shoe.
  • Corey Vost: Credit to the ‘person&# 8217; she managed to achieve something many wish for and few witness...
  • The Mighty Oz: Chris, I was thinking about the comments, what do you think ?
  • admin: Oz @ 232. Do you mean for posts or for comments?
  • The Mighty Oz: Linda, Take a look at this link – can you imagine what it must be like for Waitrose customers....

Recent Posts


Lib Dem logo
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law: This website is published and promoted by by Bruce Smart at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh, on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS

Technical Help : Graham Osborn

Posts To Remember

Categories

Categories

Asda or Makro Council Budget Crime & Policing District Core Strategy District Wide Elections Essex & East Future Housing Green Belt Highways & Parking History and Culture Hockley Hullbridge Leisure and Sport Liberal Democrats Local Democracy Local Facilities National Politics No Category Planning Applications Rawreth Rayleigh Rochford Web Stuff YouTube and Video

500 HOUSES BETWEEN LONDON ROAD AND RAWRETH LANE

There's lots of information on the District Council website about the planning application "North of London Road ". To see it , just click here.

The Core Strategy

This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here click here. (2.5mb)

Planning Applications…

If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.

If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.

Reporting A Problem

If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.

Essex Political Blogs

Geography, History , Science

Lib Dem Websites

Local Council Websites

Local History

Local Info

Non-Political Stuff

Other Lib Dem Blogs

Planning Issues

Join Your Local Team

If you read onlineFOCUS for a while you can see the kind of things we are trying to achieve locally. Maybe you would like to help us?


If you fancy helping us deliver leaflets, or actively campaigning for us at election time, or simply just helping behind the scenes with paperwork, please contact the onlineFOCUS team here.

“Rayleigh was the birthplace of Britain’s first surviving quintuplets, but that’s just one of its many claims to fame”

When the Olympic Torch came to Rayleigh, Chris Black wrote about the town in the Guardian - read it here

Join the National Team

If you would like email updates on what the Lib Dems are doing nationally, click here.
If you would like to join the Lib Dems click here.

Meta