onlineFOCUS – News and Stuff For Rochford District since 2003

 

February 19th, 2014 |

Why The District Council Voted To Increase Council tax by 1.89 %

pound_coin

It’s estimated that in 5 years time the District Council will get £687,000 a year less in government grant than we get now.

So its not surprising that District Councillors voted last night to increase the District Council part of the council tax by 1.89 %. That’s equivalent to 7 1/2 pence per week for a band D property. We don’t have a figure yet for the overall council tax – the biggest part is set by the County Council, but there’s also parish councils, the Fire Service and Essex Police.

In a recorded vote, the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and the Rochford Residents Party voted in favour, and the Greens voted against. Green group leader Michael Hoy said this was because they couldn’t support earlier decisions made on the council budget.

Its worth writing here about the three main types of government grant and how they are changing.

The first is the traditional “Revenue Support Grant” from Central Government. Basically Whitehall has a complicated formula to work out how much grant each council gets. Very urban, with lots of inner-city problems? You get more grant. Very rural, so your dustcarts have to drive half a mile between each home? You get more grant. Have lots of commuters coming to work in your area and dropping litter in their lunch-hours You get more grant! Trouble is, Rochford District isn’t inner city and not rural enough either, and its residents commute to other places, so our grant has always been low. And now Revenue Support Grant is being greatly reduced. This year we get £2,282,000, but it’s estimated that in five years time we will get about 2 million pounds less.

On the plus side the government is letting councils keep some business rates. The calculations are very complicated, but it looks likely that this year we can keep £1,544,000 of business rates and that in five years time we will be allowed to keep about £600,000 more.

The third part of the picture is the “New Homes Bonus”.
Some people might think it is a positive incentive to provide new homes for people , others might think it is more like financial coercion, but anyway, the following explanation of the “New Homes Bonus” was included in a report to the council meeting on Jan 28th:

This Government incentive to encourage more homes was introduced in 2011/12. It is based on the increase in new houses and bringing empty homes back into use and the grant matches Council Tax for 6 years, with 80% being received by the district council, as the planning authority, and 20% going to the county. The growth in housing is measured from a statistical return which reports the Council Tax base as at September each year and the NHB is based on an average Council Tax rate.
There is also an additional reward of £350 for each new affordable home and Council provided Travellers’ pitch, which is measured in April each year, again split 80:20 to districts and county.

On the predicted housing figures for the years ahead, it’s estimated that we will get £440,000 this year from the New Homes Bonus and about £800,000 more in five years time. So like or hate it, the New Homes Bonus is going to be important for council finances. And in fact at last night’s meeting Tory leader Terry Cutmore said “:

“We will need to ensure that we achieve growth targets in new housing to make up for this loss”

However Chris Black replied on this point , saying that he would judge future planning applications on their planning merits, and that he hoped all councillors would continue to do so!

One Response to “Why The District Council Voted To Increase Council tax by 1.89 %”

  1. 1
    JIM Cripps:

    As I thought the Accountants have taken over the asylum , what a way to run the country – carrot and stick, we are going backwards rapidly.

Leave a Reply


+ 9 = thirteen

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

Choose the layout you want to see

July 2014
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

Who We Are

We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click here to email us .

viewfrommount

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.



Daily Reporting by Chris Black

With support from:
Ron Oatham Ron Oatham Bruce Smart Bruce Smart Chris Stanley Chris Stanley

Latest Comments

  • Collins: Thanks Christine for your comments I am presenting our case th. Council this evening and the basis of this...
  • Jim Cripps: Richard @7 – getting the volume away via the watercourses is of course fundamental, and cleared...
  • Jim Cripps: West Rayleigh / Rawreth people unite and help the cause by sending a simple e-mail to the Planning...
  • 123: I understand that the 3 councillors required to call this in has now happened. Is there any hard evidence of...
  • Jim Cripps: I reiterate my request for any specific information on issues at the Eon site on Sunday - this is...
  • admin: Jim. , deadline is midnight Friday, will probably send a call-in request tonight.
  • richard lambourne: Chris, that is blindingly obvious the problem with watercourse is that you have to make sure there...
  • bruce smart: As posted previously, we would all have more sympathy for any agency that cleared drainage ditches and...
  • BC: Yes maybe Church Road could take one of those slots!! Like many others is was only neighbours pulling together...
  • bruce smart: But it should mean that problem areas have been identified, should have been known already, and plans...
  • Jim Cripps: The essence of this development ( and my letter ) is they (RDC) only appear to be dealing with crossing...
  • John Mason: @Jim Cripps 10 I have asked Chris to find out whether the notable changes referred to in his article were...
  • Christine Paine: Of course if I were of a cynical turn of mind I could think this was to avoid coming face to face...
  • admin: Richard, the works here have dealt with troublespot on this watercourse, we now need to look downstream at...
  • Jim Cripps: CHRIS – running out of time , is it being called in ?, I’ve written to the Inspector direct...
  • Jim Cripps: Spot on mate – and did you know the most profitable premium rate is applied to each ‘pitch...
  • Jim Cripps: Probably aware ,via watching Facebook, that a lot of people were planning to attend on the back of...
  • richard lambourne: This a predictable response, but probably too little, what we would all like to hear is that a...
  • richard lambourne: W£hat a cop out please read this drivel and I leave you all to comment http://www.r...
  • richard lambourne: What we are missing here is the avoricious need to suck in the “New Homes Bonus” which...
  • John: It seems that the Environment Agency or whoever objected to this 2008 Developement were right, as there have...
  • The Mighty Oz: Folks, not the correct place for this post ( sorry ) but just in case you are unaware the road works...
  • Jim Cripps: Can someone cleverer at IT than me, please put on here the Surface Water Flood Map – Environmen...
  • Christine Paine: Last August, the incredibly wet winter, and Sunday afternoon. Three “once in a hundred...

Recent Posts


Lib Dem logo
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law: This website is published and promoted by by Bruce Smart at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh, on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS

Technical Help : Graham Osborn

Posts with Most Comments

Categories

Categories

Asda or Makro Council Budget Crime & Policing District Core Strategy District Wide Elections Essex & East Future Housing Green Belt Highways & Parking History and Culture Hockley Hullbridge Leisure and Sport Liberal Democrats Local Democracy Local Facilities National Politics No Category Planning Applications Rawreth Rayleigh Rochford Web Stuff

The Core Strategy

This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here click here. (2.5mb)

Planning Applications…

If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.

If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.

Reporting A Problem

If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.

The Roads That Need Repairing


The County Council admitted in July that over 200 roads in our district need repairing! They say they will fix them by May 2013. Click here to see the list.

Essex Political Blogs

History

Lib Dem Websites

Local Council Websites

Local Info

Non-Political Stuff

Other Lib Dem Blogs

Planning Issues

Join Your Local Team

If you read onlineFOCUS for a while you can see the kind of things we are trying to achieve locally. Maybe you would like to help us?


If you fancy helping us deliver leaflets, or actively campaigning for us at election time, or simply just helping behind the scenes with paperwork, please contact the onlineFOCUS team here.

“Rayleigh was the birthplace of Britain’s first surviving quintuplets, but that’s just one of its many claims to fame”

When the Olympic Torch came to Rayleigh, Chris Black wrote about the town in the Guardian - read it here

Join the National Team

If you would like email updates on what the Lib Dems are doing nationally, click here.
If you would like to join the Lib Dems click here.

Meta