onlineFOCUS – News and Stuff For Rochford District since 2003

 

February 19th, 2014 |

Why The District Council Voted To Increase Council tax by 1.89 %

pound_coin

It’s estimated that in 5 years time the District Council will get £687,000 a year less in government grant than we get now.

So its not surprising that District Councillors voted last night to increase the District Council part of the council tax by 1.89 %. That’s equivalent to 7 1/2 pence per week for a band D property. We don’t have a figure yet for the overall council tax – the biggest part is set by the County Council, but there’s also parish councils, the Fire Service and Essex Police.

In a recorded vote, the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and the Rochford Residents Party voted in favour, and the Greens voted against. Green group leader Michael Hoy said this was because they couldn’t support earlier decisions made on the council budget.

Its worth writing here about the three main types of government grant and how they are changing.

The first is the traditional “Revenue Support Grant” from Central Government. Basically Whitehall has a complicated formula to work out how much grant each council gets. Very urban, with lots of inner-city problems? You get more grant. Very rural, so your dustcarts have to drive half a mile between each home? You get more grant. Have lots of commuters coming to work in your area and dropping litter in their lunch-hours You get more grant! Trouble is, Rochford District isn’t inner city and not rural enough either, and its residents commute to other places, so our grant has always been low. And now Revenue Support Grant is being greatly reduced. This year we get £2,282,000, but it’s estimated that in five years time we will get about 2 million pounds less.

On the plus side the government is letting councils keep some business rates. The calculations are very complicated, but it looks likely that this year we can keep £1,544,000 of business rates and that in five years time we will be allowed to keep about £600,000 more.

The third part of the picture is the “New Homes Bonus”.
Some people might think it is a positive incentive to provide new homes for people , others might think it is more like financial coercion, but anyway, the following explanation of the “New Homes Bonus” was included in a report to the council meeting on Jan 28th:

This Government incentive to encourage more homes was introduced in 2011/12. It is based on the increase in new houses and bringing empty homes back into use and the grant matches Council Tax for 6 years, with 80% being received by the district council, as the planning authority, and 20% going to the county. The growth in housing is measured from a statistical return which reports the Council Tax base as at September each year and the NHB is based on an average Council Tax rate.
There is also an additional reward of £350 for each new affordable home and Council provided Travellers’ pitch, which is measured in April each year, again split 80:20 to districts and county.

On the predicted housing figures for the years ahead, it’s estimated that we will get £440,000 this year from the New Homes Bonus and about £800,000 more in five years time. So like or hate it, the New Homes Bonus is going to be important for council finances. And in fact at last night’s meeting Tory leader Terry Cutmore said “:

“We will need to ensure that we achieve growth targets in new housing to make up for this loss”

However Chris Black replied on this point , saying that he would judge future planning applications on their planning merits, and that he hoped all councillors would continue to do so!

One Response to “Why The District Council Voted To Increase Council tax by 1.89 %”

  1. 1
    JIM Cripps:

    As I thought the Accountants have taken over the asylum , what a way to run the country – carrot and stick, we are going backwards rapidly.

Leave a Reply


− two = 6

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

Choose the layout you want to see

November 2014
M T W T F S S
« Oct    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Who We Are

We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click here to email us .

viewfrommount

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.



Daily Reporting by Chris Black

With support from:
Ron Oatham Ron Oatham Bruce Smart Bruce Smart Chris Stanley Chris Stanley

Latest Comments

  • Jim Cripps: 3600 x family of four = 14400 , so a new Hospital? / more Doctors-Dentist s? / Social Services ? etc;etc;...
  • White Van Man: [Not published as being contrary to the RDC Social Media Policy: http://www.roch ford.gov.uk/...
  • Jim Cripps: Given the most recent rain was persistent ( rather than extraordinary ) this shows just how close to...
  • Corey Vost: Jim, this is nothing new – this has been on the cards for a number of years with plans available to...
  • The Mighty Oz: It’s all a mystery…& #8230;😳 http://www.inde pendent.co.uk/n ews/people/wilk o-johnson-n...
  • Jim Cripps: I see Countryside and their chums ( Chelmsford Councillors this time ) are at it again – 3600 new...
  • Linda Kendall: I know nothing about this Wilko person whatsoever except my daughter bought rather expensive tickets...
  • Greenbelt: I received one due to the fact that, having made formal objections throughout the Local Development...
  • Christine Paine: Didn’t get one of the letters, but I’ve seen the details. As far as I can see a bit of...
  • Chris Black: It may be strange …. but I heard him on Radio 2 this morning, sounding pretty good after having a...
  • admin: I’ve not seen one….
  • Local resident: Did they reply?
  • Jim Cripps: So, has anyone else received the notification of the modifications to the submitted outline planning...
  • Jim Cripps: Yes Oz – up against a long established “clubR 21; (which includes the judiciary )...
  • The Mighty Oz: Jim, no surprise that Euro Claggy has managed, yet again, to “leadR 21; his party to oblivion...
  • admin: Had another attack yesterday… ;.
  • Terry: Sounds similar to the family of one of the RDC councillors selling their land off the London road for...
  • The Mighty Oz: I understand that each case is different but this ruling may not bode well for the campaign....
  • Christine Paine: Of course green belt also gives greater profit to developers (not that that even crosses anyones...
  • Linda Kendall: Re. Objection sent in August 2013 as noted above. This document can be found in the www.Rayleigh...
  • Linda Kendall: Christine @ 5 . Yes of course it would but they don’t even have to use any energy whatsoever...
  • Christine Paine: Now this may seem like a really silly idea, but rather than put out a call for land, which almost...
  • admin: Have a look here to see how it kicked off lat time. At this stage I don’t think the land north of London...
  • admin: Well, it’s implemented by the council to see what sites could be available for development if additional...

Recent Posts


Lib Dem logo
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law: This website is published and promoted by by Bruce Smart at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh, on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS

Technical Help : Graham Osborn

Posts To Remember

Categories

Categories

Asda or Makro Council Budget Crime & Policing District Core Strategy District Wide Elections Essex & East Future Housing Green Belt Highways & Parking History and Culture Hockley Hullbridge Leisure and Sport Liberal Democrats Local Democracy Local Facilities National Politics No Category Planning Applications Rawreth Rayleigh Rochford Web Stuff YouTube and Video

500 HOUSES BETWEEN LONDON ROAD AND RAWRETH LANE

There's lots of information on the District Council website about the planning application "North of London Road ". To see it , just click here.

The Core Strategy

This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here click here. (2.5mb)

Planning Applications…

If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.

If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.

Reporting A Problem

If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.

Food Hygiene Ratings

To find the food hygiene rating for eating places and other businesses in our district , click here.

Essex Political Blogs

Geography, History , Science

Lib Dem Websites

Local Council Websites

Local History

Local Info

Non-Political Stuff

Other Lib Dem Blogs

Planning Issues

Join Your Local Team

If you read onlineFOCUS for a while you can see the kind of things we are trying to achieve locally. Maybe you would like to help us?


If you fancy helping us deliver leaflets, or actively campaigning for us at election time, or simply just helping behind the scenes with paperwork, please contact the onlineFOCUS team here.

“Rayleigh was the birthplace of Britain’s first surviving quintuplets, but that’s just one of its many claims to fame”

When the Olympic Torch came to Rayleigh, Chris Black wrote about the town in the Guardian - read it here

Join the National Team

If you would like email updates on what the Lib Dems are doing nationally, click here.
If you would like to join the Lib Dems click here.

Meta