onlineFOCUS – News and Stuff For Rochford District since 2003

 

February 19th, 2014 |

Why The District Council Voted To Increase Council tax by 1.89 %

pound_coin

It’s estimated that in 5 years time the District Council will get £687,000 a year less in government grant than we get now.

So its not surprising that District Councillors voted last night to increase the District Council part of the council tax by 1.89 %. That’s equivalent to 7 1/2 pence per week for a band D property. We don’t have a figure yet for the overall council tax – the biggest part is set by the County Council, but there’s also parish councils, the Fire Service and Essex Police.

In a recorded vote, the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and the Rochford Residents Party voted in favour, and the Greens voted against. Green group leader Michael Hoy said this was because they couldn’t support earlier decisions made on the council budget.

Its worth writing here about the three main types of government grant and how they are changing.

The first is the traditional “Revenue Support Grant” from Central Government. Basically Whitehall has a complicated formula to work out how much grant each council gets. Very urban, with lots of inner-city problems? You get more grant. Very rural, so your dustcarts have to drive half a mile between each home? You get more grant. Have lots of commuters coming to work in your area and dropping litter in their lunch-hours You get more grant! Trouble is, Rochford District isn’t inner city and not rural enough either, and its residents commute to other places, so our grant has always been low. And now Revenue Support Grant is being greatly reduced. This year we get £2,282,000, but it’s estimated that in five years time we will get about 2 million pounds less.

On the plus side the government is letting councils keep some business rates. The calculations are very complicated, but it looks likely that this year we can keep £1,544,000 of business rates and that in five years time we will be allowed to keep about £600,000 more.

The third part of the picture is the “New Homes Bonus”.
Some people might think it is a positive incentive to provide new homes for people , others might think it is more like financial coercion, but anyway, the following explanation of the “New Homes Bonus” was included in a report to the council meeting on Jan 28th:

This Government incentive to encourage more homes was introduced in 2011/12. It is based on the increase in new houses and bringing empty homes back into use and the grant matches Council Tax for 6 years, with 80% being received by the district council, as the planning authority, and 20% going to the county. The growth in housing is measured from a statistical return which reports the Council Tax base as at September each year and the NHB is based on an average Council Tax rate.
There is also an additional reward of £350 for each new affordable home and Council provided Travellers’ pitch, which is measured in April each year, again split 80:20 to districts and county.

On the predicted housing figures for the years ahead, it’s estimated that we will get £440,000 this year from the New Homes Bonus and about £800,000 more in five years time. So like or hate it, the New Homes Bonus is going to be important for council finances. And in fact at last night’s meeting Tory leader Terry Cutmore said “:

“We will need to ensure that we achieve growth targets in new housing to make up for this loss”

However Chris Black replied on this point , saying that he would judge future planning applications on their planning merits, and that he hoped all councillors would continue to do so!

One Response to “Why The District Council Voted To Increase Council tax by 1.89 %”

  1. 1
    JIM Cripps:

    As I thought the Accountants have taken over the asylum , what a way to run the country – carrot and stick, we are going backwards rapidly.

Leave a Reply


+ two = 11

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

Choose the layout you want to see

December 2014
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  

Who We Are

We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click here to email us .

viewfrommount

Comments Policy

We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.



Daily Reporting by Chris Black

With support from:
Ron Oatham Ron Oatham Bruce Smart Bruce Smart Chris Stanley Chris Stanley

Latest Comments

  • Jim Cripps: 10,000 probably represents pretty much all of West Rayleigh & Hullbridge who are against it , the...
  • James Newport: It’s totally disgusting how this many residents views can be disregarded. I hope that come...
  • Linda Kendall: Thank you for the above report. Very fair. Perhaps it should be clearly reported that RDC were found...
  • Jim Cripps: Disappointing yes, surprise no – the ‘establis hment ‘ always gets what it wants via...
  • admin: We will be writing about this later tonight…. Save your comments till then!
  • Jim Cripps: Oz @ 22 & 23 above – It is you being so cheerful that keeps us all going mate 😛. @22 – I...
  • The Mighty Oz: And here is some more depressing news, still all those new people will need somewhere to eat…....
  • The Mighty Oz: I’m with Christine @ 1, the developer will be back again and again until the golf course is...
  • The Mighty Oz: Oh dear, they think it’s all over, it is now http://www.echo -news.co.uk/new s/local_news...
  • Jim Cripps: A Matthews & 3 – please name him/her , as they are clearly not doing their job.
  • Sue Murton: I am delighted it was refused it is like a heavy weight lifted from my shoulders and I cannot thank those...
  • A.Matthews: What concerns me is the lack of County responsibility to Highways and Waste Management issues .It was...
  • Jim Cripps: A mighty well done to all concerned – gives me some hope of a fair hearing for the forthcoming...
  • Christine Paine: To say I am delighted to read this would be an understatement. I’m sure this won’t be...
  • Jim Cripps: Well , surprise-surpri se – one look at the EA Flood Risks maps and here we go again with wholesale...
  • Whitevanman: Oh Yeah – Politician = spin = statistics = lies . I am back in the real world now
  • The Mighty Oz: Sue@1, I’m sure you feel pretty fed up about the golf course but come on, Elf & Safety...
  • Jim Cripps: So, houses in the flood risk zone but not Solar Panels – what is the rationale there then?.
  • A.Matthews: Beware of politicians bearing promises! You may not get what you expect! Still no Rochford Matters . Good...
  • admin: Doesn’t EVERY candidate promise to address the local issues?
  • admin: Sue , I’m very sorry for not getting back to you with the revised plans, I have sent you a separate...
  • Sue Murton: Chris Black said he would get back to me with revised plans but I have heard nothing. My property will...
  • Whitevanman: Here’s a thought – We all have the perfect opportunity to express our feelings next May at...
  • The Mighty Oz: Linda @ 14, Any idea who stole the banner yet…̷ 0;just wondered if you had any clues….

Recent Posts


Lib Dem logo
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law: This website is published and promoted by by Bruce Smart at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh, on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS

Technical Help : Graham Osborn

Posts To Remember

Categories

Categories

Asda or Makro Council Budget Council Drama Crime & Policing District Core Strategy District Wide Elections Essex & East Future Housing Green Belt Highways & Parking History and Culture Hockley Hullbridge Leisure and Sport Liberal Democrats Local Democracy Local Facilities National Politics No Category Planning Applications Rawreth Rayleigh Rochford Web Stuff YouTube and Video

500 HOUSES BETWEEN LONDON ROAD AND RAWRETH LANE

There's lots of information on the District Council website about the planning application "North of London Road ". To see it , just click here.

The Core Strategy

This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here click here. (2.5mb)

Planning Applications…

If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.

If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.

Reporting A Problem

If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.

Food Hygiene Ratings

To find the food hygiene rating for eating places and other businesses in our district , click here.

Essex Political Blogs

Geography, History , Science

Lib Dem Websites

Local Council Websites

Local History

Local Info

Non-Political Stuff

Other Lib Dem Blogs

Planning Issues

Join Your Local Team

If you read onlineFOCUS for a while you can see the kind of things we are trying to achieve locally. Maybe you would like to help us?


If you fancy helping us deliver leaflets, or actively campaigning for us at election time, or simply just helping behind the scenes with paperwork, please contact the onlineFOCUS team here.

“Rayleigh was the birthplace of Britain’s first surviving quintuplets, but that’s just one of its many claims to fame”

When the Olympic Torch came to Rayleigh, Chris Black wrote about the town in the Guardian - read it here

Join the National Team

If you would like email updates on what the Lib Dems are doing nationally, click here.
If you would like to join the Lib Dems click here.

Meta