onlineFOCUS – News and Stuff For Rochford District since 2003

 

February 19th, 2014 |

Why The District Council Voted To Increase Council tax by 1.89 %

pound_coin

It’s estimated that in 5 years time the District Council will get £687,000 a year less in government grant than we get now.

So its not surprising that District Councillors voted last night to increase the District Council part of the council tax by 1.89 %. That’s equivalent to 7 1/2 pence per week for a band D property. We don’t have a figure yet for the overall council tax – the biggest part is set by the County Council, but there’s also parish councils, the Fire Service and Essex Police.

In a recorded vote, the Conservatives, Liberal Democrats and the Rochford Residents Party voted in favour, and the Greens voted against. Green group leader Michael Hoy said this was because they couldn’t support earlier decisions made on the council budget.

Its worth writing here about the three main types of government grant and how they are changing.

The first is the traditional “Revenue Support Grant” from Central Government. Basically Whitehall has a complicated formula to work out how much grant each council gets. Very urban, with lots of inner-city problems? You get more grant. Very rural, so your dustcarts have to drive half a mile between each home? You get more grant. Have lots of commuters coming to work in your area and dropping litter in their lunch-hours You get more grant! Trouble is, Rochford District isn’t inner city and not rural enough either, and its residents commute to other places, so our grant has always been low. And now Revenue Support Grant is being greatly reduced. This year we get £2,282,000, but it’s estimated that in five years time we will get about 2 million pounds less.

On the plus side the government is letting councils keep some business rates. The calculations are very complicated, but it looks likely that this year we can keep £1,544,000 of business rates and that in five years time we will be allowed to keep about £600,000 more.

The third part of the picture is the “New Homes Bonus”.
Some people might think it is a positive incentive to provide new homes for people , others might think it is more like financial coercion, but anyway, the following explanation of the “New Homes Bonus” was included in a report to the council meeting on Jan 28th:

This Government incentive to encourage more homes was introduced in 2011/12. It is based on the increase in new houses and bringing empty homes back into use and the grant matches Council Tax for 6 years, with 80% being received by the district council, as the planning authority, and 20% going to the county. The growth in housing is measured from a statistical return which reports the Council Tax base as at September each year and the NHB is based on an average Council Tax rate.
There is also an additional reward of £350 for each new affordable home and Council provided Travellers’ pitch, which is measured in April each year, again split 80:20 to districts and county.

On the predicted housing figures for the years ahead, it’s estimated that we will get £440,000 this year from the New Homes Bonus and about £800,000 more in five years time. So like or hate it, the New Homes Bonus is going to be important for council finances. And in fact at last night’s meeting Tory leader Terry Cutmore said “:

“We will need to ensure that we achieve growth targets in new housing to make up for this loss”

However Chris Black replied on this point , saying that he would judge future planning applications on their planning merits, and that he hoped all councillors would continue to do so!

One Response to “Why The District Council Voted To Increase Council tax by 1.89 %”

  1. 1
    JIM Cripps:

    As I thought the Accountants have taken over the asylum , what a way to run the country – carrot and stick, we are going backwards rapidly.

Leave a Reply


− four = 2

You can add images to your comment by clicking here.

Choose the layout you want to see

March 2015
M T W T F S S
« Feb    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Who We Are

We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click here to email us .


Comments Policy

We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.



Daily Reporting by Chris Black

With support from:
Ron Oatham Ron Oatham Bruce Smart Bruce Smart Chris Stanley Chris Stanley
viewfrommount

Latest Comments

  • bruce smart: I wonder whether our MP will once again be the member of the public allowed to speak against the...
  • Linda Kendall: As usual RDC make sure only the few can get to the information!!
  • Brian Guyett: Ian @9: Great care needs to be taken in definitions. RDC propose to build a new industrial site on...
  • admin: Jim, sorry, it seems to be on of those temporary links. You will need to go the council website at...
  • Jim Cripps: Admin – the link does’nt seem to work ?,
  • Linda Kendall: Ian Jordon @ 11. Many ‘degraded greenfield̵ 7; and ‘brownfie ld’ sites were...
  • Jim Cripps: The conversion of RIE into 230 dwellings is still in the plan , in fact RDC have changed it’s...
  • The Mighty Oz: Jim @ 7, Like your little pun re Pet Subject, anyway,I have been applying my Mighty Oz brain to...
  • A.Matthews: I assume Ian you are referring to Eldon Way.If so it is indicative of what is happening in the Peninsula...
  • Jim Cripps: No – land North of the London Rd is not Brown Field , for example converting the old /unused Smiths...
  • Ian Jordan: Point 4 above: Why was’nt building on Brown Field Sites taken seriously ? Isn’t this a Brown Field...
  • Jim Cripps: Oz @4 – my faith in the Papers is equalled only by my faith in the Council website, I suggest a FOI...
  • Jim Cripps: SE ESSEX Action Group Alliance update – in just a month since formal launch the group has now...
  • Richard Lambourne: What the Tories are failing to say is that they didn’t have to go to the high court to fight...
  • Jim Cripps: Oz @ 3 – Not, not that often , would you care to expand your theorem please ?..JIM.
  • The Mighty Oz: Jim, Toby, Can you please tell me where the figure of £50K for the cemetery comes from. I have looked...
  • The Mighty Oz: Linda @ 14, still waiting…. .
  • The Mighty Oz: Jim @ 1, Have you ever heard the expression, One mans ceiling is another mans floor ?
  • Brian Guyett: Alistair @6. The original Retail & leisure Study was one of the very first outputs and clearly...
  • Toby Mountain: Jim (@ no 2) I have been asking questions about the Pet Cemetery for a while – To no avail! As...
  • Jim Cripps: Suggestion – when you get a pre-election knock on the door have a set of these local issue...
  • Jim Cripps: Well said Admin and, if the Lodge Ward loyalists are so concerned with spending, perhaps they would like...
  • Linda Kendall: John Mason @ 2. Re. Your hope that RDC Planners take note of Comments and Objections during the...
  • Jim Cripps: If anyone has a copy of the Flyer they can spare ?, I would gladly collect it from you. Thanks –...

Recent Posts


Lib Dem logo
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law: This website is published and promoted by by Bruce Smart at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh, on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS

Technical Help : Graham Osborn

Posts To Remember

Categories

Categories

Asda or Makro Council Budget Council Drama Crime & Policing District Core Strategy District Wide Elections Essex & East Future Housing Green Belt Highways & Parking History and Culture Hockley Hullbridge Leisure and Sport Liberal Democrats Local Democracy Local Facilities National Politics No Category Planning Applications Rawreth Rayleigh Rochford Web Stuff YouTube and Video

500 HOUSES BETWEEN LONDON ROAD AND RAWRETH LANE

There's lots of information on the District Council website about the planning application "North of London Road ". To see it , just click here.

The Core Strategy

This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here click here. (2.5mb)

Planning Applications…

If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.

If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.

Reporting A Problem

If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.

Food Hygiene Ratings

To find the food hygiene rating for eating places and other businesses in our district , click here.

Essex Political Blogs

Geography, History , Science

Lib Dem Websites

Local Council Websites

Local History

Local Info

Non-Political Stuff

Other Lib Dem Blogs

Planning Issues

Join Your Local Team

If you read onlineFOCUS for a while you can see the kind of things we are trying to achieve locally. Maybe you would like to help us?


If you fancy helping us deliver leaflets, or actively campaigning for us at election time, or simply just helping behind the scenes with paperwork, please contact the onlineFOCUS team here.

“Rayleigh was the birthplace of Britain’s first surviving quintuplets, but that’s just one of its many claims to fame”

When the Olympic Torch came to Rayleigh, Chris Black wrote about the town in the Guardian - read it here

Join the National Team

If you would like email updates on what the Lib Dems are doing nationally, click here.
If you would like to join the Lib Dems click here.

Meta