14 Responses to “Another Chance To Climb The Tower (Weather Permitting!)”
May 5th, 2014 at 06:05
Seems rather daft to me that only 8 year old and above can do this after all I took my four year old up the windmill and have you seen them staircases? Surely if he can manage that then he can manage this, it’s not like us parents leave them to their own devices or put them in unsuitable danger. I would be interested to know why there is an age limit. Any ideas?
The Mighty Oz:
May 5th, 2014 at 08:05
It’s all about EU Elf & Safety, once Captain Farage is in charge then normal service will be resumed……just you wait, at last a party saying what we are all saying in our own homes….
May 5th, 2014 at 09:05
I haven’t been up the church tower for a couple of years, but I would say that although the windmill steps are steep, the church tower is quite a bit higher than the mill and not so well lit. And its quite narrow – there isn’t enough room for people to go up and down at the same time. Also when you get to the top you are out in the open (which can be a bit scary) Though a seven year old wouldn’t be able to see anything over the parapet unless an adult put the child on their shoulder.
And anyway its nothing to with the EU!
The Mighty Oz:
May 5th, 2014 at 09:05
I beg to differ, EU directive 1347.678.897 issue 6 states that no seven year old can exceed the height of a 300 year old church parapet….
May 6th, 2014 at 07:05
Well that is OK then as the Church is much older than 300 years – so exempt as defined in the Nanny State doctrine article 1001 sub- section 9 that now rules the world.
May 7th, 2014 at 07:05
Why does every Health and Safety issue have to be viewed in a negative way? Some rules are there for good reason and in this case to protect young children. It is most likely that the windmill has a different insurer with different stipulations. Besides which, it was very windy at the top of the tower on Monday.
The Mighty Oz:
May 8th, 2014 at 01:05
Most Elf & Safety enforcements having little to do with protecting the individual and a lot more about protecting themselves from the No Win No Fee brigade. I think I right in saying started by a change in the law by the last Loony Lefty Labour party
I know a very respectable 50-something businessman who nearly got charged by the police for carrying a knife as part of his motorcycle toolkit. I’m not convinced he should automatically go to prison for 6 months for doing that twice….
May 11th, 2014 at 07:05
I walked through Leigh-on-Sea old town with a craft knife in my pocket on Friday, the purpose being to carry out a survey for rot in an old wooden boat owned by the Sea Scouts. The only form of authority I observed was a parking attendant!
The Mighty Oz:
May 11th, 2014 at 06:05
Come on guys – you know as well as I do this is about trying to stop yobs from carrying knives and killing people, not about decent law abiding people making the odd mistake. Go to the back of the class….
Oz, but if you bring in mandatory sentencing, the ‘decent law abiding person’ who makes two mistakes goes to prison for 6 months. No exceptions.
And for what its worth, judges already have the power to sentence someone to four years in jail for carrying a knife:
Oz, yes I am still taking the same standpoint.
I take knife crime very seriously. I particularly remember the Lib Dem councillor Andrew Pennington who was posthumously awarded the George Medal after defending an MP at a surgery from a sword attack.
But clearly 6 month sentences aren’t long enough for real thugs, but too long for absent-minded chaps who keep knives in the car when they shouldn’t do, or perhaps girls pressurised by their boyfriends into carrying knives for them.
I’ll be posting something separate about those knife crime figures….
We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click hereto email us .
We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.
Daily Reporting by Chris Black
With support from:
Jim Cripps: Richard @7 – getting the volume away via the watercourses is of course fundamental, and cleared...
Jim Cripps: West Rayleigh / Rawreth people unite and help the cause by sending a simple e-mail to the Planning...
123: I understand that the 3 councillors required to call this in has now happened. Is there any hard evidence of...
Jim Cripps: I reiterate my request for any specific information on issues at the Eon site on Sunday - this is...
admin: Jim. , deadline is midnight Friday, will probably send a call-in request tonight.
richard lambourne: Chris, that is blindingly obvious the problem with watercourse is that you have to make sure there...
bruce smart: As posted previously, we would all have more sympathy for any agency that cleared drainage ditches and...
BC: Yes maybe Church Road could take one of those slots!! Like many others is was only neighbours pulling together...
bruce smart: But it should mean that problem areas have been identified, should have been known already, and plans...
Jim Cripps: The essence of this development ( and my letter ) is they (RDC) only appear to be dealing with crossing...
John Mason: @Jim Cripps 10 I have asked Chris to find out whether the notable changes referred to in his article were...
Christine Paine: Of course if I were of a cynical turn of mind I could think this was to avoid coming face to face...
admin: Richard, the works here have dealt with troublespot on this watercourse, we now need to look downstream at...
Jim Cripps: CHRIS – running out of time , is it being called in ?, I’ve written to the Inspector direct...
Jim Cripps: Spot on mate – and did you know the most profitable premium rate is applied to each ‘pitch...
Jim Cripps: Probably aware ,via watching Facebook, that a lot of people were planning to attend on the back of...
richard lambourne: This a predictable response, but probably too little, what we would all like to hear is that a...
richard lambourne: W£hat a cop out please read this drivel and I leave you all to comment http://www.r...
richard lambourne: What we are missing here is the avoricious need to suck in the “New Homes Bonus” which...
John: It seems that the Environment Agency or whoever objected to this 2008 Developement were right, as there have...
The Mighty Oz: Folks, not the correct place for this post ( sorry ) but just in case you are unaware the road works...
Jim Cripps: Can someone cleverer at IT than me, please put on here the Surface Water Flood Map – Environmen...
Christine Paine: Last August, the incredibly wet winter, and Sunday afternoon. Three “once in a hundred...
Gordon Toal: Again our elected council are acting in an arrogant and foolhardy manner. The changes to the Development...
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law:
This website is published and promoted by by Bruce Smart at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh, on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh
The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS
This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here
click here. (2.5mb)
If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.
If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.
Reporting A Problem
If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.
The Roads That Need Repairing
The County Council admitted in July that over 200 roads in our district need repairing! They say they will fix them by May 2013.
here to see the list.