14 Responses to “Another Chance To Climb The Tower (Weather Permitting!)”
May 5th, 2014 at 06:05
Seems rather daft to me that only 8 year old and above can do this after all I took my four year old up the windmill and have you seen them staircases? Surely if he can manage that then he can manage this, it’s not like us parents leave them to their own devices or put them in unsuitable danger. I would be interested to know why there is an age limit. Any ideas?
The Mighty Oz:
May 5th, 2014 at 08:05
It’s all about EU Elf & Safety, once Captain Farage is in charge then normal service will be resumed……just you wait, at last a party saying what we are all saying in our own homes….
May 5th, 2014 at 09:05
I haven’t been up the church tower for a couple of years, but I would say that although the windmill steps are steep, the church tower is quite a bit higher than the mill and not so well lit. And its quite narrow – there isn’t enough room for people to go up and down at the same time. Also when you get to the top you are out in the open (which can be a bit scary) Though a seven year old wouldn’t be able to see anything over the parapet unless an adult put the child on their shoulder.
And anyway its nothing to with the EU!
The Mighty Oz:
May 5th, 2014 at 09:05
I beg to differ, EU directive 1347.678.897 issue 6 states that no seven year old can exceed the height of a 300 year old church parapet….
May 6th, 2014 at 07:05
Well that is OK then as the Church is much older than 300 years – so exempt as defined in the Nanny State doctrine article 1001 sub- section 9 that now rules the world.
May 7th, 2014 at 07:05
Why does every Health and Safety issue have to be viewed in a negative way? Some rules are there for good reason and in this case to protect young children. It is most likely that the windmill has a different insurer with different stipulations. Besides which, it was very windy at the top of the tower on Monday.
The Mighty Oz:
May 8th, 2014 at 01:05
Most Elf & Safety enforcements having little to do with protecting the individual and a lot more about protecting themselves from the No Win No Fee brigade. I think I right in saying started by a change in the law by the last Loony Lefty Labour party
I know a very respectable 50-something businessman who nearly got charged by the police for carrying a knife as part of his motorcycle toolkit. I’m not convinced he should automatically go to prison for 6 months for doing that twice….
May 11th, 2014 at 07:05
I walked through Leigh-on-Sea old town with a craft knife in my pocket on Friday, the purpose being to carry out a survey for rot in an old wooden boat owned by the Sea Scouts. The only form of authority I observed was a parking attendant!
The Mighty Oz:
May 11th, 2014 at 06:05
Come on guys – you know as well as I do this is about trying to stop yobs from carrying knives and killing people, not about decent law abiding people making the odd mistake. Go to the back of the class….
Oz, but if you bring in mandatory sentencing, the ‘decent law abiding person’ who makes two mistakes goes to prison for 6 months. No exceptions.
And for what its worth, judges already have the power to sentence someone to four years in jail for carrying a knife:
Oz, yes I am still taking the same standpoint.
I take knife crime very seriously. I particularly remember the Lib Dem councillor Andrew Pennington who was posthumously awarded the George Medal after defending an MP at a surgery from a sword attack.
But clearly 6 month sentences aren’t long enough for real thugs, but too long for absent-minded chaps who keep knives in the car when they shouldn’t do, or perhaps girls pressurised by their boyfriends into carrying knives for them.
I’ll be posting something separate about those knife crime figures….
We are Liberal Democrat councillors and campaigners in Rochford District.
We want to improve local decision-making and we see onlineFOCUS as a good way of keep residents informed and involved.
Please click hereto email us .
We welcome your comments, they are very important to us. However please note:
* We may not necessarily agree with the comments made by our readers
* We ask everyone to treat people with respect when making a comment. No personal abuse please.
Daily Reporting by Chris Black
With support from:
Chris Black: Oz, I didn’t have strong feelings on this one. The ‘cafeR 17; would just be a converted...
Linda Kendall: Brian @ 18. I have just quickly scanned the document you quote and although my view is many companies...
Linda Kendall: Re. 17 above. What I failed to point out was that the ‘NEW̵ 7; site for the Rawreth...
Jim Cripps: I’ve been quietly sitting in and listening to Council debates on a regular basis for about 18...
The Mighty Oz: Chris, can you tell us why you voted against the cafe in Hockley Woods ?
A.Matthews: Ian back to he subject.The loss of more industrial units emphasises what I said in 13 above.Yes this is a...
Jim Cripps: Is there an election coming up then?…..
Jim Cripps: Core Strategy – excellent value at £2.1 million then , bloody outrageous , a Public Enquiry indeed...
Ian Jordan: This is about Main Road Hawkwell, not land North of London Road, I can’t see much greenfield on...
Brian Guyett: The latest document to be added to the Evidence Base is The Employment Land Study Report 2014...
The Mighty Oz: Copied from the BBC news site this morning… Some 200,000 homes will be made available to...
admin: Brian @ 8 – you can comment in the election period about a planning application in the same way as at...
bruce smart: Thanks – personally do not see Mark as a member of the public. As our MP he should probably be...
Brian Guyett: Delay the application until after the election? That would be a brave call. A full, detailed,...
Angelina: Bruce Smart, he is at the request of Hullbridge Residents Association. He met with them on the 30th...
John Mason: Bruce @ 4 I understand that the Hullbridge Residents Association has asked Mark Francois MP to speak as a...
Jim Cripps: Bruce – probably not , I think his remit is Wickford & Rayleigh – or is he MP for...
Linda Kendall: The proposed Heavy Industrial Site that is planned for land at the junction of the A1245 (old A130)...
bruce smart: I wonder whether our MP will once again be the member of the public allowed to speak against the...
Linda Kendall: As usual RDC make sure only the few can get to the information!!
Brian Guyett: Ian @9: Great care needs to be taken in definitions. RDC propose to build a new industrial site on...
admin: Jim, sorry, it seems to be on of those temporary links. You will need to go the council website at...
Jim Cripps: Admin – the link does’nt seem to work ?,
Linda Kendall: Ian Jordon @ 11. Many ‘degraded greenfield̵ 7; and ‘brownfie ld’ sites were...
Legal Statement for the purposes of complying with electoral law:
This website is published and promoted by by Bruce Smart at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh, on behalf of Liberal Democrat Candidates all at 12 Ferndale Road, Rayleigh
The technology and hosting used for this website is provided by 1&1 Internet Limited, The Nova Building, Herschel Street Slough SL1 1XS
There's lots of information on the District Council website about the planning application "North of London Road ".
To see it , just click here.
The Core Strategy
This is the official master document for planning policy in our district! To download it, click here
click here. (2.5mb)
If you want information on a particular planning application, you can find it on the District Council website here.
If you want to know what new planning applications have been submitted this week, click here.
Reporting A Problem
If you want to report a problem, you can email Lib Dems councillors by clicking here.
There's also an independent website called FixMyStreet. It's very good for reporting minor street problems like holes in the road, grafitti or failed streetlights. You can find FixMyStreet here.
Food Hygiene Ratings
To find the food hygiene rating for eating places and other businesses in our district , click here.